Commonwealth of Australia Explanatory Memoranda

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]


SOCIAL SECURITY (ADMINISTRATION) AMENDMENT (REPEAL OF CASHLESS DEBIT CARD AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2022

                                 2022




      THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA




                               SENATE




SOCIAL SECURITY (ADMINISTRATION) AMENDMENT (REPEAL OF CASHLESS
           DEBIT CARD AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2022




           SUPPLEMENTARY EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM




           Amendments to be moved on behalf of the Government




                     (Circulated by the authority of the
       Minister for Social Services, the Hon Amanda Rishworth MP)


AMENDMENTS TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY (ADMINISTRATION) AMENDMENT (REPEAL OF CASHLESS DEBIT CARD AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2022 OUTLINE These government amendments to the Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Repeal of Cashless Debit Card and Other Measures) Bill 2022 (the Bill) respond to matters arising from the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee's inquiry into the Bill (the Senate Inquiry) and continuing consultations with stakeholders. Many submitters to the Senate Inquiry supporting the abolition of the Cashless Debit Card (CDC) raised specific concerns that the Bill created a framework under which the Minister could unilaterally determine that CDC participants living in the Northern Territory could be transitioned to the income management regime (IM) with a BasicsCard after the CDC program is repealed. Concerns were specifically expressed about the outdated technology of the BasicsCard, which is the basis of the IM, given that these people have been supported with modern technology to this point. Contemporary Card The amendments respond to the concerns by ensuring that a person who was on the CDC program and moves to IM will not return to outdated technology, which support the BasicsCard, but will have a contemporary card with more modern functionality, including accessing more merchants, allowing for BPAY and online shopping and better supports money management. Individuals transitioning from CDC to IM will now transition onto enhanced Income Management regime (enhanced IM) under new Part 3AA of the Administration Act inserted in the Bill by these amendments. Rather than return to the use of stored value cards, individuals will be provided with a BasicsCard bank account that ensures a modern technological functionality. This provides continuity and a consistent approach for participants in IM locations. Participants on enhanced IM who have a BasicsCard bank account will receive support from Services Australia, including all aspects of client interface such as account enquiries and replacement cards. This is similar to the services provided by Services Australia for the BasicsCard. Transfer to IM in the Northern Territory The amendments remove the Minister's power, via legislative instrument, to identify class of persons in the Northern Territory to determine whether existing participants on the CDC will return to IM. Instead, these amendments will confirm the arrangements that people who would otherwise be eligible for IM in the Northern Territory under the disengaged youth or long-term welfare payment recipient IM measures will transition to enhanced IM on 6 March 2023. There has been substantial concern that not transferring CDC participants living in the Northern Territory to enhanced IM would be discriminatory to the existing IM participants in the Northern Territory who decided to remain on IM when the CDC was rolled out in the communities. This measure will ensure that a consistent and impartial


approach can be applied across the Northern Territory. The amendments will also provide certainty to participants and communities on the future arrangements. This will provide for consistency across the Northern Territory where approximately 23,000 individuals are currently subject to IM, compared to approximately 4,000 on the CDC. While the long-term aim is to move towards a voluntary program, consistency across the Northern Territory is important during the consultation and transition process that will be required before the long-term approach can be settled. Financial impact statement The amendments will require the procurement and development of a card to support the enhanced IM program. These costs are subject to commercial negotiations and are not for publication. Definitions In this supplementary explanatory memorandum: • Administration Act means the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999. • Bill means the Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Repeal of Cashless Debit Card and Other Measures) Bill 2022. • CDC or CDC program means the cashless welfare arrangements established by Part 3D of the Administration Act. • enhanced IM means the enhanced income management regime to be established under proposed Part 3AA of the Administration Act • Family Assistance Act means the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999. • Family Assistance Administration Act means the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999. • IM means the income management regime established by Part 3B of the Administration Act. • National Emergency Declaration Act means the National Emergency Declaration Act 2020. • Part 3B payment nominee has the same meaning as in section 123TC of the Administration Act. • Secretary means the Secretary of the Department. • Social Security Act means the Social Security Act 1991. Amendment 1--Commencement of new Part 1A Amendment 1 will insert a new table item 2A into the table in clause 2 of the Bill to commence new Part 1A of Schedule 1 to the Bill (inserted by Amendment 15). New Part 1A inserts into the Administration Act new arrangements for the enhanced IM regime in the Northern Territory. New Part 1A will commence immediately after


Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the Bill commences, that is, immediately after the first moment of the latter of 19 September 2022 and the day after the Act is given the Royal Assent. Amendments 2 to 14--reversing exists from CDC and compulsory transition from CDC to traditional IM under Part 3B in the Northern Territory Amendments 2 to 14 are included to reverse certain provisions in the Bill which were intended to allow for CDC program participants under section 124PGE (that is, whose usual residence is, was or becomes the Northern Territory) to transition from CDC to traditional IM. Amendment 2 opposes items 2 to 6 of Schedule 1 to the Bill, which relate to the IM child protection and vulnerable welfare payment recipient measures under, respectively, sections 123UC and 123UCA of the Administration Act. These items were included in the Bill to facilitate the transition of CDC program participants in the Northern Territory under Part 3D of the Administration Act to the IM regime under Part 3B of that Act. These items are no longer required because automatic transition to the enhanced IM regime will be given effect under new Part 3AA. The transition to enhanced IM responds to concerns raised by submitters to the Senate Inquiry that individuals accustomed to the technological functionality of the CDC should not revert to the standard BasicsCard. Amendment 3 omits proposed subsection 123UCA(4) from item 7 of Schedule 1 to the Bill relating to the IM vulnerable welfare payment recipients measure in Part 3B of the Administration Act. Subsection 123UCA(4) is no longer required due to automatic transition of CDC program participants residing in the Northern Territory to enhanced IM under Part 3AA of the Administration Act. The Minister will therefore not need a power to determine a class or classes of persons who will transition to the IM vulnerable welfare payment recipient measure in section 123UCA of the Administration Act. Amendment 4 opposes items 8 to 10 of Schedule 1 to the Bill, which relate to the IM disengaged youth measure under section 123UCB of the Administration Act. These items were included in the Bill to facilitate the transition of CDC program participants in the Northern Territory under Part 3D of the Administration Act to the IM regime under Part 3B of that Act. These items are no longer required because automatic transition to enhanced IM will be given effect under new Part 3AA. The transition to enhanced IM responds to concerns raised by submitters to the Senate Inquiry that individuals accustomed to the technological functionality of the CDC should not revert to the standard BasicsCard. Amendment 5 omits proposed subsection 123UCB(5) from item 11 of Schedule 1 to the Bill relating to the disengaged youth IM measure in Part 3B of the Administration Act. Subsection 123UCB(5) is no longer required due to the automatic transition of CDC program participants residing in the Northern Territory to enhanced IM under new Part 3AA of the Administration Act. The Minister will therefore not need a power to determine a class or classes of persons who will transition under the disengaged youth IM measure in section 123UCB of the Administration Act.


Amendment 6 opposes items 12 to 14 of Schedule 1 to the Bill, which relate to the long-term welfare payment recipients IM measure in section 123UCC of the Administration Act. These items were included in the Bill to facilitate the transition of individuals residing in the Northern Territory who are CDC program participants under Part 3D of the Administration Act to the IM regime under Part 3B of that Act. These items are no longer required because the transition to enhanced IM will be given effect under new Part 3AA. The transition to enhanced IM responds to concerns raised by submitters to the Senate Inquiry that individuals accustomed to the technological functionality of the CDC should not revert to the standard BasicsCard. Amendment 7 omits proposed subsection 123UCC(5) from item 15 of Schedule 1 to the Bill relating to the IM long-term welfare payment recipients measure in Part 3B of the Administration Act. Subsection 123UCC(5) is no longer required due to the automatic transition of CDC program participants residing in the Northern Territory to enhanced IM under Part 3AA of the Administration Act. The Minister will therefore not need a power to determine a class or classes of persons who will transition under the IM long-term welfare payment recipients measure in section 123UCC of the Administration Act. Amendment 8 opposes item 16 of Schedule 1 to the Bill, which relates to the IM school enrolment measure in section 123UD of the Administration Act. This item was included in the Bill to facilitate the transition of individuals residing in the Northern Territory who are CDC program participants under Part 3D of the Administration Act to the IM regime under Part 3B of that Act. This item is no longer required because the transition to enhanced IM will be given effect under new Part 3AA. The transition to enhanced IM responds to concerns raised by submitters to the Senate Inquiry that individuals accustomed to the technological functionality of the CDC should not revert to the standard BasicsCard. Amendment 9 omits proposed subsection 123UD(4A) from item 17 of Schedule 1 to the Bill relating to the IM school enrolment measure in Part 3B of the Administration Act. Subsection 123UD(4A) is no longer required due to the automatic transition of CDC program participants who reside in the Northern Territory to enhanced IM under Part 3AA of the Administration Act. The Minister will therefore not need a power to determine a class or classes of persons who will transition under the IM school enrolment measure in section 123UD of the Administration Act. Amendment 10 opposes item 18 of Schedule 1 to the Bill, which relates to the IM school attendance measure in section 123UE of the Administration Act. This item was included in the Bill to facilitate the transition of individuals residing in the Northern Territory who are CDC program participants under Part 3D of the Administration Act to the IM regime under Part 3B of that Act. These items are no longer required because the transition to enhanced IM will be given effect under new Part 3AA. The transition to enhanced IM responds to concerns raised by submitters to the Senate Inquiry that individuals accustomed to the technological functionality of the CDC should not revert to the standard BasicsCard. Amendment 11 omits proposed subsection 123UE(5) from item 19 of the Bill relating to the IM school attendance measure in Part 3B of the Administration Act. Subsection 123UE(5) is no longer required due to the automatic transition of CDC


program participants residing in the Northern Territory to enhanced IM under Part 3AA of the Administration Act. The Minister will therefore not need a power to determine a class or classes of persons who will transition under the IM school attendance measure in section 123UE of the Administration Act. Amendment 12 opposes item 27 of Schedule 1 to the Bill, which relates to the IM other State/Territory referrals measures in section 123UFAA of the Administration Act. This item was included in the Bill to facilitate the transition of individuals residing in the Northern Territory who are CDC program participants under Part 3D of the Administration Act to the IM regime under Part 3B of that Act. This item is no longer required because the transition to enhanced IM will be given effect under new Part 3AA. The transition to enhanced IM responds to concerns raised by submitters to the Senate Inquiry that individuals accustomed to the technological functionality of the CDC should not revert to the standard BasicsCard. Amendment 13 omits proposed subsection 123UFAA(3) from item 28 of the Bill relating to the IM other State/Territory referrals measure in Part 3B of the Administration Act. Subsection 123UFAA(3) is no longer required due to the automatic transition of CDC program participants residing in the Northern Territory to enhanced IM under Part 3AA of the Administration Act. The Minister will therefore not need a power to determine a class or classes of persons who will transition under the IM other State/Territory referrals measure in section 123UE of the Administration Act. Amendment 14 opposes item 40 of Schedule 1 to the Bill, which adds new subsections 124PGE(9) to (12) to allow CDC program participants under the Northern Territory CDC measures to opt out of CDC by making an exit request to the Secretary which, once made, cannot be withdrawn or revoked. Under the Bill, the Secretary would be required to give a notice to the program participant to give effect to the exit request no later than 7 days after the day on which the request was made. This item is no longer needed as the Bill will provide that people who are CDC program participants and reside in the Northern Territory will automatically transition to the enhanced IM regime on 6 March 2023. This will ensure participants' transition between programs is supported and seamless, and there is no gap in servicing. Amendment 15--Stage 1A amendments relating to the Northern Territory Amendment 15 will insert new Part 1A into the Bill dealing with Stage 1A amendments. The Stage 1A amendments amend the National Emergency Declaration Act and the Administration Act to reflect new Part 3AA dealing with enhanced IM to certain persons whose usual place of residence is within the Northern Territory. Amendments to the National Emergency Declaration Act Amendment 15 inserts new item 48A to amend paragraph (zba) in the definition of 'national emergency law' in the Definitions section (section 10) of the National Emergency Declaration Act. Amended paragraph (zba) will provide that new section 123SM of the Administration Act (inserted by item 48B) is a national emergency law for the purposes of the National Emergency Declaration Act.


The definition of 'national emergency law' is used in the National Emergency Declaration Act as part of the tests for the Prime Minister to request a declaration of a national emergency and to request the variation of a declaration to extend the duration of an emergency. In addition, the definition provides an authoritative list of provisions across the statute book that may be enlivened, or the operation of which may be modified, while a national emergency is in force. The fact that a provision is listed in the definition of national emergency law in the National Emergency Declaration Act does not otherwise affect the interpretation or operation of the provision. Section 123SM of the Administration Act deals with the splitting of certain welfare payments into qualified and unqualified portions to ensure that expenditure of welfare payments prioritises spending on basic human needs. This amendment is necessary to operationalise new subparagraph 123SM(4)(a)(iii), which allows the Secretary to vary, under subsection 123SM(3), the percentages of the qualified portions and unqualified portions of payments in certain circumstances. Relevantly, qualified percentages can be varied if the Secretary is satisfied that the person is unable to use the person's debit card that is attached to the person's BasicsCard bank account or is unable to access their BasicsCard bank account as a direct result of a declared national emergency (where the applicable national emergency declaration remains in force). Amendments to the Administration Act Amendment 15 also inserts new item 48B in Schedule 1 to the Bill to amend the simplified outline in section 123SA of the Administration Act in recognition that a person will become subject to the enhanced IM regime under new section 123SG because among other things: (a) the person meets the criteria relating to disengaged youth and the person's usual place of residence is within the Northern Territory (b) the person meets the criteria relating to long-term welfare payment recipients and the person's usual place of residence is within the Northern Territory. Amendment 15 will also insert new item 48C in the Bill to include a range of new definitions. Section 123SD will insert definitions for the following new terms: balance of the qualified portion, of a category D welfare payment, means: (a) if a deduction is to be made from, or an amount is to be set off against, the payment under: (i) section 61, 61A or 238 of this Act; or (ii) section 1231 of the Social Security Act; or (iii) section 84, 84A, 92, 92A, 225, 226, 227 or 228A of the Family Assistance Administration Act; the amount of the qualified portion of the payment less the amount of the deduction or the amount of the set-off; or (b) in any other case--the amount of the qualified portion of the payment.


This definition of 'balance of the qualified portion' is required to ensure that welfare payments that are subject to splitting will only be split after deductions and set-offs are given effect. The example below illustrates how the definition will work in practice. EXAMPLE: Jay is subject to the enhanced IM regime and is entitled to category D welfare payments totalling $1000 per fortnight. Jay has set up a Centrepay or RDS deduction of $200 per fortnight for rent. Jay's qualified portion and unqualified portion of the category D welfare payments are each 50% or $500 per fortnight. After Jay's rent deduction, Services Australia will pay the balance of the qualified portion of Jay's category D welfare payments--being an amount of $300--into Jay's BasicsCard bank account while the remaining $500 will be paid into Jay's normal bank account for discretionary spending. The definition of 'category C welfare payment' will identify the type of welfare payment that a person must receive in order to be subject to the enhanced IM regime. The definition of 'category D welfare payment' will identify the types of welfare payment that a person that will be subject to welfare quarantining under section 123SG. If a payment is not mentioned, 100% of the payment will be paid in full to the recipient. The following definitions are included in section 123SD to provide pointers to specified sections for their substantive meaning: exempt welfare payment recipient, which is defined to have the same meaning as in Part 3B. This term is defined in section 123TC of the Administration Act as having the same meaning given by sections 123UGB, 123UGC or 123UGD of that Act. qualified portion, of a category D welfare payment, which is defined to have the meaning given by section 123SRA. This is discussed further below. unqualified portion, of a category D welfare payment, which is defined to have the meaning given by section 123SRA. This is discussed further below. Persons subject to the enhanced IM regime--Northern Territory Amendment 15 inserts a new item 48D into the Bill for the purpose of adding a new section 123SD. This new section will set out the criteria for identifying who will become subject to enhanced IM due to, among other things, having their usual place of residence within the Northern Territory immediately prior to 6 March 2023. Two measures corresponding to IM measures under Part 3B will be applicable to persons residing in the Northern Territory who become subject to enhanced IM: disengaged youth and long-term welfare payment recipients. Disengaged youth New subsection 123SD(1) deals with the situation where a person is subject to the enhanced IM regime by virtue of being a 'disengaged youth', residing in the Northern


Territory and previously subject to the CDC program under Part 3D of the Administration Act. These provisions are consistent with section 123UCB, which provides the criteria for an individual to be subject to IM under the disengaged youth measure in Part 3B of the Administration Act. New subsection 123SD(1) provides that a person is subject to enhanced IM at a particular time (the test time) on or after 6 March 2023 if: (a) immediately before 6 March 2023: (i) the person was a program participant under Part 3D of the Administration Act; and (ii) the person's usual place of residence was within the Northern Territory; and (b) at the test time, the person's usual place of residence is within the Northern Territory; and (c) at the test time, the person is an eligible recipient of a category C welfare payment; and (d) at the test time, the person is at least 15 years of age and under 25 years of age; and (e) at the test time, the person is not an exempt welfare payment recipient; and (f) if, at the test time, the person has a Part 3B payment nominee-- that nominee is subject to enhanced IM (under Part 3AA) or is subject to IM (under Part 3B); and (g) the person was an eligible recipient of a category C welfare payment for at least 13 weeks during the 26-week period ending immediately before the test time. Subsection 123SD(2) provides that if a person is subject to enhanced IM under subsection 123SD(1) and the person's usual place of residence ceases to be in the Northern Territory, the person will remain subject to enhanced IM until the earliest of any of the following occurrences: (a) the person ceases to be an eligible recipient of a category C welfare payment; or (b) the person reaches 25 years of age; or (c) the person becomes an exempt welfare payment recipient; or (d) if the person has a Part 3B nominee--that nominee ceases to be subject to enhanced IM (under Part 3AA) or IM (under Part 3B); or (e) it has been 13 weeks from the day the person ceased to reside in the Northern Territory. Subsection 123SD(2) is consistent with IM in that the person will remain subject to welfare quarantining for 13 weeks after they cease to be eligible for enhanced IM under the substantive eligibility provision.


Long-term welfare payment recipients New subsection 123SD(3) establishes the criteria for enhanced IM that apply when a person is subject to the enhanced IM regime by virtue of being a 'long-term welfare payment recipient', residing in the Northern Territory, and having previously been subject to the CDC program under Part 3D of the Administration Act. These provisions are consistent with section 123UCC, which provides the criteria for a person to be subject to IM under the long-term welfare recipient measure in Part 3B of the Administration Act. The subsection provides that a person is subject to enhanced IM at a particular time (the test time) on or after 6 March 2023 if: (a) immediately before 6 March 2023: (i) the person was a program participant under Part 3D of the Administration Act; and (ii) the person's usual place of residence was within the Northern Territory; and (b) at the test time, the person's usual place of residence is within the Northern Territory; and (c) at the test time, the person is an eligible recipient of a category C welfare payment; and (d) at the test time, the person is at least 25 years of age but has not reached pension age; and (e) at the test time, the person is not an exempt welfare payment recipient; and (f) if, at the test time, the person has a Part 3B payment nominee--the nominee is subject to enhanced IM (under Part 3AA) or is subject to IM (under Part 3B); and (g) the person was an eligible recipient of a category C welfare payment for at least 52 weeks during the 104-week period ending immediately before the test time. Subsection 123SD(4) provides that if a person is subject to the enhanced IM under subsection 123SD(3), but the person's usual place of residence is no longer in the Northern Territory, the person will remain subject to enhanced IM until the earliest of the following occurrences: (a) the person ceases to be an eligible recipient of a category C welfare payment; or (b) the person reaches pension age; or (c) the person becomes an exempt welfare payment recipient; or (d) if the person has a Part 3B nominee--that nominee ceases to be subject to enhanced IM (under Part 3AA) or IM (under Part 3B); or (e) it has been 13 weeks since the day the person ceased to reside in the Northern Territory.


Subsection 123SD(4) is consistent with IM in that the person will remain subject to welfare quarantining for 13 weeks after they cease to be eligible funder the substantive provision. Amendment 15 also inserts item 48E in the Bill. This item will establish new Subdivision B--Persons subject to the enhanced IM regime--Northern Territory in Division 3 of Part 3AA of the Administration Act to provide for welfare splitting percentages and the use of qualified portions and unqualified portions. New section 123SM provides for the qualified and unqualified portion percentages that apply if an instalment of a category D welfare payment is payable to a person who is subject to enhanced IM due to, among other things, having their usual place of residence within Northern Territory at the test time. New subsection 123SM(1) provides that if an instalment of a category D welfare payment is payable to a person who is subject to the enhanced income management regime under new section 123SRA : • the percentage of the gross amount of the qualified portion, is 50%; and • the percentage of the gross amount of the unqualified portion is 50%. There is a note at the end of subsection 123SM(1) to inform the reader that the qualified and unqualified portion percentages may be varied under subsection (3). Subsection 123SM(2) provides that if a category D welfare payment is payable, otherwise than by instalments, to a person who is subject to the enhanced income management regime under section 123SD, 100% of the gross amount of the payment is qualified (the qualified portion). There is a note at the end of subsection 123SM(2) to inform the reader that the qualified and unqualified portion percentages may be varied under subsection (3). Variation of qualified portion and unqualified portion by Secretary Subsection 123SM(3) provides that the Secretary has a discretionary power to determine that a volunteer to the enhanced IM may be subject to different apportionment percentages. In particular, the Secretary can vary the qualified portion applicable to volunteers in the following way: • category D welfare payments paid by instalment can be varied so that the qualified portion is 0% and the unqualified portion is 100% • category D welfare payments paid by lump sum can be varied so that the qualified portion is 0%. Subsection 123SM(3) does not give the Secretary discretion to vary the set percentages. This means that the Secretary is not able to increase the qualified portion of a payment.


Subsection 123SM(4) provides that the Secretary may only vary the percentages the qualified and unqualified portions under subsection 123SM(3) in specified circumstances. These circumstances are that: (a) the Secretary is satisfied that the person is unable to use the person's debit card which is attached to the person's BasicsCard bank account or is unable to access their BasicsCard bank account, as a direct result of: (i) a technological fault or malfunction with that card or account; or (ii) a natural disaster; or (iii) if a national emergency declaration (within the meaning of the National Emergency Declaration Act) is in force--an emergency to which the declaration relates; or (b) the person's category D welfare payment is payable in instalments and the Secretary is satisfied that any part of the payment is payable: (i) at a time determined under subsection 43(2) of the Administration Act, where that determination is made because the person is in severe financial hardship as a result of exceptional and unforeseen circumstances; or (ii) under a determination under subsection 51(1) of the Administration Act relating to advance payments in cases of severe financial hardship. Subsection 123SM(5) provides that a determination under subsection 123SM(3) will take effect on the date specified in the determination. This must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made. This provides certainty to the welfare recipient and the administering agency. To avoid doubt, subsection 123SM(6) confirms that a notice given under subsection 123SM(3) is not a legislative instrument. This provision is merely declaratory of the law and does not provide a substantive exemption to the Legislation Act 2003. Payment of the balance of qualified portion of category D welfare payment New section 123SN provides for the manner of payment of a qualified portion, where an instalment of a category D welfare payment is payable to a person who is subject to enhanced IM under section 123SD. The Secretary must pay the balance of the qualified portion of the category D welfare payment to the credit of a BasicsCard bank account maintained by the recipient. Recipient's use of funds from category D welfare payment New section 123SO establishes that a person who is subject to enhanced IM under section 123SD and has an amount of welfare payment remaining after deductions and set-offs, may use the balance of their qualified portion to obtain goods or services (other than excluded goods or excluded services or a cash-like product that could be used to obtain excluded goods or excluded services) and the unqualified portion at the person's discretion.


Excluded goods and excluded services have the same meaning as Part 3B of the Administration Act and are therefore consistent with the IM regime. Excluded goods are alcoholic beverages, tobacco products, pornographic material and goods specified in a legislative instrument made by the Minister. Excluded services are gambling or a service specified in a legislative instrument made by the Minister. Amendment 15 also insets items 48F and 48G that amend paragraphs in the Administration Act dealing with review processes. New items 48F and 48G will, respectively, amend paragraphs 127(4)(ad) and 144(lc) to omit the phrase ', 124PGC(9) or 124PGE(10)' and substitute it with the words 'or 124PGC(9)'. These amendments are consequential to Amendment 14, which opposes item 40 of Schedule 1 to the Bill. Due to item 40 being opposed, CDC program participants under the Northern Territory measure (section 124PGE of the Administration Act) will not be able to request to exit CDC. The Secretary's power to issue notices to individuals requesting exit CDC under subsection 124PGE(10) in item 40 is also opposed. With the removal from the Bill of the proposed power to issue opt-out exit notices, these consequential amendments to internal and Administrative Appeals Tribunal review are required. Amendment 16 opposes item 63 of Schedule 1 to the Bill, which amended several sections that would have had the effect of preventing voluntary exits from CDC for some classes of persons in the Northern Territory before the latter of 19 September 2022 and the day after the day the Act is given the Royal Assent. Under item 63, paragraphs 123UCA(1)(f), 123UCB(1)(h), 123UCCC(1)(h), 123UC(1)(ha), 123UE(1)(ka) and 123JFAA(1)(h) were to be amended to omit the phrase 'and on or after that day the person has ceased to be a program participant under that section' to reflect the repeal of Part 3D of the Act. These paragraphs, respectively, related to the following IM measures under Part 3B: vulnerable welfare payment recipients; disengaged youth; long-term welfare payment recipients; school enrolment; school attendance; and State/Territory referrals. Item 63 is no longer needed because it relates to the following items of the Bill which are also opposed by these amendments: item 4 (for paragraph 123UCA(1)(f) see Amendment 2), item 8 (for paragraph 123UCB(1)(h) see Amendment 4), item 12 (for paragraph 123UCC(1)(h) see Amendment 6), item 16 (for paragraph 123UCD(1)(h) see Amendment 8), item 18 (for paragraph 123UE(1)(ka) see Amendment 10) and item 27 (for paragraph 123UFAA(1)(h) see Amendment 12).


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 SOCIAL SECURITY (ADMINISTRATION) AMENDMENT (REPEAL OF CASHLESS DEBIT CARD AND OTHER MEASUERS) ACT 2022 This Bill is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. The Bill delivers the Australian government's election commitment to abolish the Cashless Debit Card (CDC). The Bill will also facilitate a transition to the new enhanced Income Management (IM) arrangements in certain cases. This Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights addresses the Bill amendments that establish enhanced IM in the Northern Territory. Human rights implications This Bill and the amendments engage the following rights: • the rights of equality and non-discrimination • the right to self-determination • the right to an adequate standard of living, including food, water and housing • the right to social security. These rights and a number of other considerations are addressed in turn below. General safeguards A number of general safeguards that will help to protect human rights have been incorporated into the proposal to abolish the CDC program and reform IM. The amendments will ensure a person who was on the CDC and is transitioned to enhanced IM will not move back onto the BasicsCard, but will have a contemporary card that ensures a modern functionality. The rights of equality and non-discrimination The rights of equality and non-discrimination are provided for in a number of the seven core international human rights treaties to which Australia is a party, most relevantly the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (the CERD). The right to equality and non-discrimination is not directly limited by enhanced IM arrangements, as the enhanced IM regime has not been applied on the basis of race or cultural factors. Enhanced IM arrangements for people whose usual residence is in the Northern Territory are based on objective criteria related to disengaged youth and long term welfare payment recipients. However, the arrangements may apply to a high proportion of First Nations people.


It is appropriate to transition CDC participants residing in the Northern Territory to enhanced IM as this will allow the cessation of the CDC program consistently with the needs of different welfare recipients in the Northern Territory (where approximately 23,000 individuals are currently subject to IM compared to approximately 4,000 IM participants who have chosen to move onto the CDC). There is a substantial concern that not transferring CDC participants who reside in the Northern Territory to enhanced IM would be discriminatory to the existing IM participants in the Northern Territory who remained on IM when the CDC was rolled out. The amendments will ensure that a consistent and impartial approach can be applied across the Northern Territory regardless of race or cultural factors. The right to self-determination Article 1 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) states that all people have the right of self-determination, which includes the right to 'freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development'. Under the enhanced IM regime, participants will be able to spend the qualified (quarantined) portion of their payment only on goods or services that will meet their priority needs. This excludes expenditure on alcohol, gambling, tobacco, pornographic material and cash-like products that could be used to purchase those excluded goods and services. To an extent, the Bill limits the human right of self-determination as it may impact on a person's ability to freely determine their economic or social development. However, by ensuring an individual's welfare payments are directed at priority needs, the amendments ensure the enhanced IM regime will address and curtail passive welfare, antisocial behaviour and entrenched disadvantage to positive social expectations. The qualified and unqualified portions for welfare restrictions are reduced by the Bill from 80% and 20% to 50% and 50%. The right to an adequate standard of living, including food, water and housing Article 11(1) of the ICESCR states that everyone has the right to an adequate standard of living, including adequate food, clothing and housing, and the continuous improvement of living conditions. Further to this, article 11(2) of the ICESCR states that the fundamental right of everyone to be free from hunger should be recognised. Those who transfer from CDC to enhanced IM in the Northern Territory will still have their rights to an adequate standard of living, including food, water and housing maintained. The only limits placed on those who transition will be in relation to excluded goods and services (i.e. alcohol, gambling, tobacco and pornographic material) or cash-like products that could be used to obtain excluded goods and services. This is critical to realising the objective of the enhanced IM program, which is to ensure welfare payments are directed towards priority goods and services, such as housing, food and bills.


The right to social security Article 9 of the ICESCR recognises the right of everyone to social security. In accordance with Article 4 of the ICESCR, the State may limit this right only insofar as such limitations may be compatible with the nature of these rights and solely for the purpose of 'promoting the general welfare in a democratic society'. The right to social security is limited only to the extent that CDC program participants residing in the Northern Territory who transition to enhanced IM may not use their payment to purchase excluded goods and services or cash-like products in areas where there has been demonstrated high levels of adverse behaviours or community harm. The amendments made by this Bill do not detract from the eligibility of a person to receive welfare or reduce the amount of a person's social security entitlement. Rather, by transitioning eligible individuals residing in the Northern Territory to the enhanced IM program, the amendments provide a mechanism to ensure that recipients of social security entitlements use a percentage of their payment to acquire essential items. To the extent that the right to social security may be limited, the limitations are reasonable, necessary and proportionate to prioritise basic living needs. Further, the measures proposed are 'promoting the general welfare' of people through the prioritisation of their expenditures. Conclusion The Bill is compatible with human rights because to the extent that it may limit human rights, those limitations are reasonable, necessary and proportionate as they are targeted towards addressing and curtailing passive welfare, antisocial behaviour and entrenched disadvantage. The measures are reasonable, necessary and proportionate to achieving the objectives of abolishing the CDC program and reforming the IM regime in Australia, and are an essential element of the Government's election commitment to support First Nations people to make their own decisions about the way forward. [Circulated by the authority of the Minister for Social Services, the Hon Amanda Rishworth MP]


Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]