[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]
2022-2023 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SENATE Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2023 ADDENDUM TO THE EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM (Circulated by authority of the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, the Hon Tony Burke MP)Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2023 Addendum to the Explanatory Memorandum This Addendum responds to concerns raised by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights in its Human Rights Scrutiny Report No. 9 dated 6 September 2023. NOTES ON CLAUSES Social Security Act 1991 Item 8 - Paragraph 1062B(k) After the paragraph 25 insert: 25(a) There are safeguards, described immediately below, which accompany the proposed amendment to section 1062B(1)(k). These safeguards apply equally to the provisions as currently drafted, and the proposed amendment to section 1062B(1)(k) does not in any way increase the risk that programs that would disadvantage or be detrimental to Indigenous persons could be funded. 25(b) First, the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (Racial Discrimination Act) would operate to prevent the making, varying and administering of grants and arrangements under section 1062A that would unlawfully disadvantage or be detrimental to Indigenous persons (see specifically subsections 9(1) and 10(1) of the Racial Discrimination Act). Subsection 8(1) of that Act enables special measures to be taken for the sole purpose of securing adequate advancement of certain racial groups requiring such protection, as may be necessary to ensure such groups have equal enjoyment or exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms. 25(c) If a program supported by section 1062A discriminated against Indigenous persons in a way that was not based on reasonable and objective criteria, and was not aimed at fulfilling a legitimate objective of substantive equality, it would risk being in breach of the Racial Discrimination Act and would be susceptible to challenge. Indeed, Commonwealth programs have been challenged on this basis.1 25(d) In developing a new policy proposal targeted at addressing Indigenous disadvantage, or with the potential to have a disproportionate impact on Indigenous persons, the department would as appropriate seek legal advice on potential discrimination issues to ensure the proposal is consistent with the Racial Discrimination Act. 1 Examples of legal challenges to government programs/measures on the basis that they breached the Racial Discrimination Act are the cases of Maloney v The Queen [2013] HCA 28 and Dawson v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2021] FCA 1636. Both involved allegations of unlawful discrimination against Indigenous peoples. In Maloney, the High Court dismissed the appeal on the grounds that the program was a "special measure" designed to protect Indigenous peoples and so did not contravene the Racial Discrimination Act. In Dawson, the parties reached a settlement agreement.
25(e) Second, the arrangements contemplated by section 1062A are beneficial in nature. This is reflected in the matters specified in subsection 1062A(1). 25(f) The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights specifically expressed concern that programs enforcing mutual obligation requirements may limit human rights. However, any detriment or disadvantage that might be associated with mutual obligation requirements would arise from provisions of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 rather than section 1062A (read with proposed subsection 1062B(k)). Section 1062A could not be used to make changes to mutual obligation requirements for jobseekers.