Commonwealth of Australia Explanatory Memoranda Commonwealth of Australia Explanatory Memoranda[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]
2002
THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
WORKPLACE
RELATIONS AMENDMENT (IMPROVED PROTECTION
FOR VICTORIAN
WORKERS) BILL 2002
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
(Circulated by authority of the Minister for Employment and
Workplace Relations,
the Honourable Tony Abbott MP)
OUTLINE
This Bill will amend the Workplace Relations Act
1996 (WR Act) to improve the workplace relations arrangements in Victorian
workplaces covered by Schedule 1A of the WR Act.
Victorian employees
not covered by a Federal award or agreement are presently covered by a safety
net of five minimum terms and conditions contained in Part XV and Schedule 1A of
the WR Act. These minimum conditions are largely a continuation of the safety
net of provisions that applied to these employees under Victorian law
immediately prior to the 1996 referral by the State of most of its industrial
relations powers. In addition, these employees are also governed by the more
general provisions of the WR Act, for example, termination of employment and
freedom of association.
The measures proposed in this Bill will ensure
that the safety net is updated in line with changing community values, whilst
protecting the single system of regulation applying in Victoria.
Specifically, this Bill will amend the WR Act to:
• give
Schedule 1A employees an entitlement to payment for work performed in excess of
38 hours a week;
• give Schedule 1A employees an entitlement to
eight days personal leave – which can be taken as sick leave, with up to
five of the eight days available to be taken as carer’s leave;
• give Schedule 1A employees an entitlement to two days
bereavement leave for the death of a member of their family or of their
household; and
• give the Australian Industrial Relations
Commission power to include supported wage arrangements in industry sector
orders.
To enhance the enforcement of the entitlements in Schedule 1A,
the Bill will:
• give inspectors the right to enter Schedule 1A
workplaces to investigate alleged breaches, and to demand documents from an
employer without the need to have first visited the workplace;
• provide for a power to make regulations requiring employers to
keep and maintain employment records for employees who are not employed under
federal awards, certified agreements or AWAs; and
• provide that a
breach of Schedule 1A conditions can be prosecuted under sections 178 and 179 of
the WR Act.
In addition, the Bill will provide the Victorian Government
with a right to intervene in proceedings before the Australian Industrial
Relations Commission in relation to:
• proceedings under section
501 of the WR Act concerning the adjustment of minimum wages applying to
Schedule 1A employees; and
• applications for suspension or
termination of a bargaining period under section 170MW of the WR Act, if one or
more of the employees to be covered by the proposed agreement is an employee in
Victoria.
The Bill will insert a mechanism for the stand-down of
Schedule 1A employees, where, due to circumstances beyond the employer’s
control, they cannot be usefully employed.
The Bill will also amend the
WR Act so as to provide an entitlement for persons performing work as outworkers
for the textile, clothing and footwear industry in Victoria, under contracts for
services, to be paid at least the amounts they would have been required to be
paid for the work because of Part XV of the WR Act (that is, because of Schedule
1A, or section 509 where applicable) if they had performed it as employees.
• For constitutional reasons, the obligation and entitlement
proposed by the Schedule will apply, on enactment, only to the extent of
contracts for services entered into by constitutional corporations, or where
work is contracted to be performed under a contract for services in the course
of, or in relation to, interstate or international trade or commerce.
• The amendments will also provide for enforcement of this
entitlement, and enable the making of regulations in relation to the keeping and
inspection of records concerning contract outwork as required for the
enforceability of the new entitlement.
FINANCIAL IMPACT STATEMENT
The measures in this Bill will
have no significant impact on Commonwealth expenditure.
REGULATION IMPACT STATEMENT
Problem:
Outworkers[1] engaged within the textiles, clothing and footwear (TCF) industry within Australia (estimated in 1996 to number between 50,000 and 329,000[2]) are generally considered to be in a disadvantaged industrial position. It is generally considered that outworkers within the TCF industry often receive payment and work under conditions which are inferior to those applicable to factory workers doing comparable work. Contract outworkers[3] are often in a particularly difficult situation due to a lack of clarity concerning their rights and entitlements.
2. The situation appears to be a particular issue in the TCF industry,
particularly the clothing industry. Under pressures for greater international
competitiveness, the TCF industry has undergone major restructuring associated
with reductions in tariffs and bounties. This has resulted in high-volume
manufacturing in the industry tending to move off-shore. At the same time
Australian manufacturing in the clothing industry, in particular, appears to
have shifted from a factory-based workforce to one centred around
outworkers.[4]
3. The Senate
Economics References Committee’s (SERC’s) Inquiry into Outworkers in
the Garment Industry in 1996, and its subsequent review in 1998, highlighted the
fact that outwork is performed predominantly in Victoria, New South Wales and
South Australia.
4. The upper limit of 329,000 outworkers nationwide,
mentioned above, equates to an estimated upper limit of 144,000 outworkers in
Victoria.[5] It is difficult, if not
impossible, to estimate how many of these are contract outworkers, as opposed to
employee outworkers.
Current Situation:
5. Currently,
outworkers in the TCF industry in Victoria fall in one of the following
categories:
(a) employee covered by an award under the Workplace
Relations Act 1996 (WR Act), most likely the Clothing Trades Award
1999;[6]
(b) employee not
covered by a federal award but covered by Schedule 1A of the WR Act (which
provides specific minimum conditions for employment in Victoria, following the
referral by Victoria of powers in respect of industrial relations matters in
1996);
(c) independent contractor working under a contract affected by
the Clothing Trades Award (as explained below); or
(d) independent contractor working under a contract not affected by the
Clothing Trades Award.[7]
6.
The Clothing Trades Award 1999 principally provides terms and
conditions of employment, but also sets standards for and in relation to
contracts for services. Consequently, the Award has the potential to
effectively regulate contract outwork in addition to employment (by imposing
obligations on principals, though without directly providing entitlements for
contractors). However, whether a contract for services is affected by the Award
depends on whether the manufacturer (at the top of the chain of contracting) or
any intervening contractor (ie a ‘middleman’) is a
respondent[8] to the award. Many
manufacturers and contractors would not be respondents to the Award, so the
Award will not affect the outworkers who perform work for them. The question
whether an outworker’s contract is affected by the Award is typically
quite unclear: outworkers’ relationships with manufacturers are typically
mediated by sub-contractors or ‘middlemen’, and outworkers commonly
do not know the identity of parties higher in the chain of contracting than the
individuals they deal with directly. Consequently, many outworkers do not
benefit from restrictions imposed by the Award with respect to the contracting
out of work.
7. Currently in Victoria, there are approximately 500
manufacturers who are respondent to the award. It is difficult to estimate the
number of manufacturers or middlemen who are not respondent to the award. It is
also difficult to estimate the number of outworkers per respondent and/or
non-respondent. A report on the National Outwork Information
Campaign[9] states that, based on
investigations by union organisers:
[approximately] one third of all
companies which are respondent to the award employ less than 10
‘inside’ [factory] workers ... the union estimates that up to three
quarters of companies in the industry have the majority of their production
performed in private homes. Commonly employing around four or five
‘inside’ workers, around 50 per cent of these companies use at least
10 outworkers, with the remainder using at least 50 outworkers ... In a number
of cases, companies employing around six factory workers each employed over 200
outworkers. Some of these outside workers are contractors themselves, who
engage others to work for them. The longer the contracting chain, the greater
the number of outworkers.
8. For those manufacturers who are respondent
to the Clothing Trades Award, clauses 45-49 of the Award impose restrictions
with respect to the contracting out of work and engagement of outworkers. These
restrictions protect the interests of factory employees covered by the award,
and also provide minimum standards for outworkers. The key clauses:
• prohibit a manufacturer respondent to the Award from employing
outworkers on terms less favourable than those prescribed under the Award in
respect of the manufacturer’s factory employees (clause 47);
and
• prohibit a manufacturer respondent to the Award from giving
out work (ie to contractors) unless:
- the contract provides terms and
conditions no less favourable than those prescribed under the Award for
outworkers (clause 46);
- the contract binds the contractor to include such a
term, if they in turn contract out the work (clause 46); and
- both the
manufacturer and the contractor are registered by a Board of Reference under the
award (clause 48).
Objective:
9. At one level, the
objective of the proposed legislation is to improve the situation for contract
outworkers in the TCF industry in Victoria, in keeping with accepted norms for
employees in the industry. The proposed legislation will give contract
outworkers in the TCF industry in Victoria access to enforceable minimum rates
of pay and improve compliance and enforcement arrangements for those workers.
The legislation aims to improve compliance by authorising federal workplace
inspectors to enter premises where such work is performed or where there are
relevant documents and empower inspectors to enforce the minimum rates of pay in
the courts.
10. At another more macro level, it is also anticipated that
the proposed legislation will assist in preserving the unitary workplace
relations system in Victoria, thereby preventing a broader layer of unnecessary
and inappropriately burdensome regulation which would otherwise be established
by Victorian legislation such as the Fair Employment Bill 2000 (Fair Employment
Bill).
11. In 1996 the Victorian Parliament referred a broad range of
workplace relations matters to the Commonwealth, giving the Commonwealth power
to legislate on those matters. The effect of the referral and associated
Commonwealth legislation was to create a unitary workplace relations system in
Victoria. The Commonwealth now has the power to legislate on workplace
relations matters. As a result, Victorian businesses no longer face the time
consuming and costly exercise of working with two different workplace relations
tribunals or systems and it is easier for employees and employers to identify
their respective rights and responsibilities.
12. To date, no other
States have followed suit and referred the bulk of their industrial relations
powers to the Commonwealth. However, the Commonwealth Government is currently
exploring the possibility of moving towards a simpler unified national workplace
relations system based primarily on the corporations power of the Constitution.
Preliminary research has highlighted considerable advantages of a unified system
and a number of problems with multiple jurisdictions. For example, in States
other than Victoria, federal and State awards often cover different categories
of employees at the same workplace causing confusion and complexity.
13.
Following the Victorian Government’s referral, Victorian employees not
governed by federal awards or federal agreements have been covered by Schedule
1A of the WR Act.
14. In 2000, the Victorian Government sought passage of
the Fair Employment Bill in order to partially reintroduce a separate layer of
workplace relations regulation in Victoria. If this had eventuated, there would
have been considerable scope for jurisdictional overlap between the Federal
system and the proposed Victorian system, thereby leading to uncertainty and
confusion for employers and employees in Victoria as to their rights and
obligations. In 2001, the Fair Employment Bill was rejected by the Victorian
Parliament, however, the Bill could be re-introduced at any time, as it
apparently continues to represent the policy of the Victorian
Government.
15. The legislation proposed by the Federal Government (the
Workplace Relations Amendment (Improved Protection for Victorian Workers)
Bill 2002) is aimed at improving legislated safety net entitlements for
Victorian workers covered by Schedule 1A of the WR Act, and introducing a new
entitlement for contract outworkers in the TCF industry.
16. The Federal
Government’s proposed legislation is acknowledgement that the position of
outworkers in the TCF industry justifies some additional safety net measures.
Their separation from business premises and the fact that many are migrants,
poorly educated, from low income groups or have few English language skills
often means that they have inadequate information about, and difficulty in
enforcing, their rights, and are not able to bargain as effectively as other
workers.
Options:
17. A number of options were considered
by the Government, including the following.
Option 1
– No Legislative Action
18. The status quo option would
be to leave contract outworkers to bargain for themselves.
19. If this
option is followed, contract outworkers would have no clear minimum rate of pay.
Contract outworkers would, however, be able to seek remedies under section 127A
of the WR Act or section 51AC of the Trade Practices Act 1974.
20. Section 127A of the WR Act enables an independent contractor (such
as a contract outworker) to apply to the Federal Court seeking a remedy on the
basis that the contract between the principal and the contract outworkers was
unfair or harsh. This remedy is only available where the principal is a
corporation (or the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth authority), the contract
relates to work in interstate or overseas trade or commerce, or the contract
affects matters in or connected with a Territory.
21. Section 51AC of the
Trade Practices Act 1974 prohibits unconscionable conduct by a person or
corporation (other than a listed public company), in trade or commerce, in
connection with the supply, possible supply, acquisition or possible acquisition
of goods or services to or by another person or corporation (other than a listed
public company). This section only applies where at least one party is a
corporation (other than a listed public company), and only where the price of
the supply or acquisition is less than $3 million. A remedy for a breach of
this section can be sought by a person (such as a contract outworker) alleging
unconscionable conduct against them, or by the Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission.
22. Employee outworkers have better access to better
remedies.
Option 2 – Legislation such as the
Victorian Fair Employment Bill
23. Through its Fair Employment Bill,
the Victorian Government sought to re-establish a separate workplace relations
system in Victoria, ostensibly to improve the statutory minimum entitlements
available to those employees currently covered by Schedule 1A of the Workplace
Relations Act.
24. The Fair Employment Bill specified a range of
minimum entitlements for general application to all Victorian employees. In
addition, the Bill would have established an independent State industrial
tribunal that would be able to regulate additional conditions of employment, by
industry sector order, for Schedule 1A workers.
25. In addition, under
the Fair Employment Bill outworkers in the TCF industry would have been deemed
to be employees for the purposes of the Bill. This differs from the legislation
proposed by the Federal Government, which does not deem contract outworkers in
the TCF industry in Victorian to be employees. Rather, it provides them with an
entitlement to receive at least the minimum hourly Schedule 1A rate of pay
applicable to TCF employees.
Option 3 – Deeming All
Outworkers in the Victorian TCF Industry to be Employees
26. The
problems arising from confusion about the employment status between outworkers
and employees were highlighted in the SERC initial inquiry into outworkers in
the garment industry in 1996, and its subsequent review in 1998. The Committee
stated that it was vital that the employment status of outworkers be resolved
and deeming outworkers as employees was suggested by certain Committee members
as one available option for clarifying the employment status of TCF outworkers.
27. The Government has considered the option of deeming all outworkers
within the TCF industry to be employees for the purposes of the WR Act,
regardless of whether they were actually engaged as employees or independent
contractors.
Option 4 – Minimum Rates of Pay for
Contract Outworkers in the Victorian TCF Industry
28. This option
consists of legislation to enforce, through the existing unitary workplace
relations system, an entitlement for contract outworkers in the TCF industry in
Victoria to receive at least the minimum hourly Schedule 1A rate of pay
applicable to TCF employees. It also provides a legislated right for federal
workplace inspectors to enter premises where such work is performed and to
empower inspectors to enforce the minimum rate of pay and associated enforcement
provisions (including record keeping obligations). The proposed legislation
will also permit the seeking of remedies in the courts on behalf of the contract
TCF outworkers where non-payment or underpayment has been identified.
29. This option is part of a broader legislative agenda aimed at
retaining a unitary system of workplace relations law in Victoria
Option 1 – No Legislative Action
30. The
remedies presently available under the WR Act and Trade Practices Act for the
protection of contract outworkers (remedies against unfair contracts and
unconscionable conduct) appear to have had limited utility for or impact on
contract outworkers. It is considered that this may be because contract
outworkers are unaware of the remedies, or they do not value the remedies
because the outcomes of applications are uncertain, or they lack the resources
necessary to seek such remedies, or they are intimidated against assertion of
their rights, or a combination of these factors.
31. If this option
was pursued, legislation like the Victorian Fair Employment Bill (with all its
associated costs – refer Option 2) would have greater likelihood of being
passed by the Victorian Parliament. Option 1, though it does not have direct
costs to business, thus needs to be considered to be as costly as Option
2.
Option 2 – Legislation such as the Victorian Fair
Employment Bill
32. If passed, the Fair Employment Bill would have
partially reintroduced a separate State system of industrial relations in
Victoria, ostensibly to improve the statutory minimum entitlements available to
those employees currently covered by Schedule 1A of the Workplace Relations Act.
Under the Fair Employment Bill, it was proposed that outworkers in the TCF
industry be deemed to be employees, regardless of whether they have been engaged
as employees or independent contractors.
33. Consequently the Fair
Employment Bill would have, amongst other things, increased the minimum rate of
remuneration for contract outworkers in the TCF industry to the minimum rates
applicable to employee outworkers (addressing the problem which this Statement
is concerned with). Options 3 and 4 would also have this effect (but would not
have the other effects of the Fair Employment Bill, which are addressed in the
following paragraphs).
34. This increased remuneration for contract
outworkers has the potential to raise the costs of activity in the TCF industry
in Victoria, which could result in decreased economic opportunities for contract
outworkers. It is not possible to quantify this impact, due to the absence of
adequate statistical evidence, however, some observations can be made about the
nature of the impact. Because this impact is common to Options 2, 3 and 4, it
is addressed in an Appendix to this Statement.
35. Option 2 is the
most costly option, because the overall effect of legislation such as the
Victorian Fair Employment Bill would be to recreate a new system of State
industrial laws, regulations, tribunal and bureaucracy. Legislation such as the
Fair Employment Bill, if reintroduced and passed would give rise to uncertainty,
confusion and potentially dual regulatory obligations for employers and
employees in Victoria covered by Federal awards. There is also the possibility
that the independent State industrial tribunal which was proposed to be
established under the Fair Employment Bill, would regulate additional conditions
of employment, by industry sector order, for Schedule 1A workers, thereby
imposing additional costs.
36. In addition to the significant direct
costs of setting up a separate industrial tribunal and compliance
mechanisms, such
a new system of industrial regulation would significantly increase the
cost of employment in Victoria and threaten jobs. Estimates of job losses over
the long term range from 1,900 jobs in the Victorian Government sponsored study
by the National Institute of Economics and Industry Research (NIEIR) to an
estimate of 40,000 jobs over three years by the Victorian Employers Chamber of
Commerce and Industry (VECCI). Meanwhile, a survey of employers operating under
Schedule 1A conducted by the Victorian Employers Chamber of Commerce and
Industry (VECCI) found that an estimated 22,000 employers suggest they would
have to reduce their workforce as a result of the introduction of a State based
system such as this.
37. It is considered that the true adverse
employment impact would be at least somewhat greater than that predicted by
NIEIR, given flaws in their research approach. For example, NIEIR’s
estimate of the number of permanent employees likely to benefit from improved
minimum conditions is considerably lower than that suggested by Australian
Centre for Industrial Relations Research and Training (ACIRRT) survey results
which form the basis of other parts of NIEIR’s modelling. In addition,
NIEIR’s modelling takes no account of the possible flow on implications of
non-Schedule 1A employees seeking to maintain relativities or the proposed Fair
Employment Tribunal increasing conditions or making industry wide orders on
other conditions.
Option 3 – Deeming All Outworkers in
the Victorian TCF Industry to be Employees
38. Deeming outworkers to
be employees under the Workplace Relations Act would result in increased
remuneration for contract outworkers, as would be the case under legislation
such as the Victorian Fair Employment Bill. As noted above, this increased
remuneration has the potential to raise the costs of activity in the TCF
industry in Victoria, which could result in decreased economic opportunities for
contract outworkers: this impact is addressed in an Appendix to this
Statement.
39. The Government has additional reservations about deeming
provisions as they effectively preclude people from being able to choose whether
to be employees or independent contractors. This could set a precedent for
other industries for which contracting provides significant benefits in terms of
flexibility and efficiency (eg information technology). To deem all outworkers
to be employees on the assumption that there is never genuine choice would seem
to place an unjustifiable constraint on the TCF industry, especially given the
lack of data about the extent of forced contracting
arrangements.
Option 4 – Minimum Rates of Pay for
Contract Outworkers in the Victorian TCF Industry
40. This option is
one element of an effective response to the position of contract outworkers in
the Victorian TCF industry. It is also one element of an effective response to
the Victorian Government’s attempt to reintroduce a workplace relations
system characterised by unnecessary and inappropriately burdensome regulation.
41. The Workplace Relations Amendment (Improved Protection for Victorian
Workers) Bill 2002 can be justified in terms of both the retention of a unitary
system of workplace relations laws in Victoria and the improvement of
safety net conditions for the Schedule 1A workforce. More specifically, that
part of the proposed legislation dealing with contract outworkers in the TCF
industry in Victoria can be justified in terms of improving the situation for
these workers. It is not without potential costs, but these costs would be
lower than the costs arising from Options 2 or 3.
(e) Effect on
Contract Outworkers in the TCF Industry
42. The proposed legislation
will provide an entitlement for contract outworkers in the TCF industry in
Victoria to receive at least the minimum rates of pay applicable to employed TCF
employees generally. It will also provide a legislated right for federal
workplace inspectors to enter relevant premises and empower inspectors to
enforce the minimum rates of pay and seek remedies in the courts on behalf of
contract TCF outworkers where non-payment or underpayment is identified.
43. This increased remuneration for contract outworkers has the
potential to raise the costs of activity in the TCF industry in Victoria, which
could result in decreased economic opportunities for contract outworkers. It is
not possible to quantify this impact, due to the absence of adequate statistical
evidence, however, some observations can be made about the nature of the impact.
Because this impact is common to Options 2, 3 and 4, it is addressed in an
Appendix to this Statement.
44. The adoption of this option would
assist to redress the issue of inferior remuneration received by TCF contract
outworkers for the work they perform. However, it has the advantage over
Options 2 and 3 of not precluding people from being able to choose whether to be
employees or independent contractors and not constraining the flexible working
arrangements that may flow from independent contract
arrangements.
(b) Effect on Employees in the TCF
Industry
45. The proposed legislation will level the playing field
for all workers in the Victorian TCF industry. It will ensure that contract
outworkers are required to be engaged at a pay rate at least equal to the
minimum amount payable to factory employees. Consequently, the proposed
legislation will remove an element of the competition which TCF employees face
from contract outworkers which could be considered unfair competition (that is,
to the extent that the price advantage of work performed by contract outworkers
depends on the outworkers being paid at rates below the minimum rates the
Government considers they should be paid at).
(c) Effect on
Businesses engaging Contract Outworkers
46. It is acknowledged that
the proposed legislation is likely to have a compliance effect on certain
businesses in the Victorian TCF industry, resulting from both increased
administration including increased record-keeping requirements, and increased
costs of production (stemming from potentially greater remuneration for contract
outworkers). However, it is emphasised that the proposed Federal legislation is
likely to have a lesser impact on the Victorian TCF industry and the Victorian
economy generally than legislation such as the Victorian Fair Employment Bill
would have (refer above under Option 2).
47. In addition, the proposed
legislation levels the playing field for those TCF businesses abiding by the
rules, further complementing award provisions in the Clothing Trades Award
1999 and those in the Homeworkers Code of
Practice[10], which each impose
restrictions on TCF manufacturers in terms of the manner in which they engage
outworkers and contractors.
(d) Effect on Consumers
48.
The proposed legislation may have an impact on prices of TCF products made in
Victoria, stemming from the greater remuneration of contract outworkers.
However, it is not possible to estimate meaningfully the extent of this impact
because of lack of data on labour costs as a proportion of production costs
generally, and comparative costs as between contract outworkers and employee
outworkers. Some observations about the parameters which would be relevant to
estimating price impacts are contained in an Appendix to this
Statement.
(e) Effect on Victorian Economy
49. In the event
of any increased costs for TCF businesses or the potential loss of jobs for
unskilled workers in the Victorian TCF industry, there may be a small localised
effect on the Victorian economy. However, this needs to be weighed against
greater benefits both in terms of Victoria retaining a unitary workplace
relations system and in terms of the social and individual benefits associated
with improving the situation for contract outworkers. The maintenance of a
single unitary system in Victoria is good for the Victorian economy and for the
Australian economy. (As noted above, the unitary system means that Victorian
businesses no longer face the time consuming and costly exercise of working with
two different workplace relations tribunals or systems and it is easier for
employees and employers to identify their respective rights and
responsibilities.)
50. Generally, Option 4 needs to be assessed in terms
of its effects on the aforementioned groups in comparison with the impact of
legislation such as the proposed Victorian Fair Employment Bill on Victorian
businesses and the Victorian economy.
Consultation:
51.
There has been broad discussion in recent years concerning the problems of
outworkers in the TCF industry and the arguments for and against deeming
outworkers to be employees.
52. In its response to the SERC Report the
Commonwealth Government undertook to bring the issue of clarification of the
employment status of outworkers in the garment industry to the attention of the
relevant State Ministers. The Workplace Relations Ministers Council (WRMC)
agreed to establish a Working Party to examine the issue and provide a Report to
WRMC. The Working Party met in October 1999 and considered both legislative and
non-legislative options and canvassed coordinated action as well as the option
of leaving individual jurisdictions to pursue their own approaches. The options
considered can be summarised as follows:
• Option 1 –
Non-legislative methods (coordinated action);
• Option 2 –
Non-legislative methods – individual jurisdictions continuing with and/or
developing their own non-legislative approaches to address the
issues;
• Option 3A – Deem all outworkers to be employees for the
purposes of the WR Act;
• Option 3B – Establish deeming
arrangements which also allow for genuine contractors;
• Option 3C
– Reverse the onus of proof;
• Option 4 – Leave individual
jurisdictions to pursue their own approaches to clarifying the status of
clothing outworkers which suit that jurisdiction.
53. There was no
consensus reached with respect to future legislative action and there appeared
to be little opportunity for reaching consensus at the national level. On the
issue of choice between employment and independent contracting there was a lack
of consensus – with NSW, Queensland and Victoria opposing the promotion of
choice.
54. Whilst not explicitly canvassed, the particular option which
is the subject of the proposed legislation falls under the heading of Option 4
– whereby individual jurisdictions pursue their own approaches to clarify
the status and entitlements of outworkers in a way which is judged to best suit
each jurisdiction.
55. The Minister for Employment and Workplace
Relations met with representatives from industry and certain community
organisations who are involved in or concerned with the engagement of outworkers
for general discussions regarding the Fair Employment Bill, including the
more specific issue of improving compliance and enforcement arrangements for
Victorian TCF outworkers.
56. Consultation on the draft legislation has
occurred with members of the National Labour Consultative Council’s
Committee on Industrial Legislation and communication has occurred with the
Victorian Government.
Conclusion and recommended
option:
57. The following is a summary of the discussion above, on
the impacts of each option.
• Option 1 (No Legislative Action) does
not have direct costs to business, but needs to be considered to be as costly as
Option 2, as it would make the occurrence of Option 2 more
likely.
• Option 2 (Legislation such as the Victorian Fair
Employment Bill) is the most costly option, as it would impose the costs of an
additional regulatory system, and the prospect of more burdensome conditions of
employment for employees in Victoria generally, as well as the costs in relation
to contract outworkers which would be imposed by Option 3.
• Option
3 (Deeming All Outworkers in the Victorian TCF Industry to be Employees) is not
preferred because, in addition to the cost of Option 4 (the cost of raising
minimum payments to contract outworkers to the level applicable to employees),
deeming would place unjustifiable constraints on the TCF industry and could set
an inappropriate precedent for other industries.
• Option 4
(Minimum Rates of Pay for Contract Outworkers in the Victorian TCF Industry) is
the most practical and lowest cost option for ensuring that contract outworkers
in Victoria receive a minimum entitlement, whilst ensuring the preservation of a
unitary workplace relations system in Victoria and thereby preventing a
workplace relations system characterised by unnecessary and inappropriately
burdensome regulation.
Implementation and review:
58.
Amendments are required to the WR Act in order to permit and require the
provision of minimum pay for contract outworkers in the Victorian TCF industry.
59. On passage of the legislative amendments, the Department of
Employment and Workplace Relations will provide a team of inspectors to educate
and investigate workplaces in Victoria where outworkers are engaged in the TCF
industry. The inspectorate will be required to report to the Minister within
three months of passage of the legislative amendments on levels of compliance
and non-compliance identified in relation to outworkers engaged in the TCF
industry throughout Victoria. The effectiveness of the amendments will be kept
under review by the Department.
APPENDIX
Economic Effect of Increasing the Minimum Rate of Remuneration for Contract Outworkers to the Minimum Wage Applicable to Employee Outworkers
1. Requiring that contract outworkers in the Victorian TCF industry be paid not less than the minimum amounts payable to employee outworkers (Option 4) would affect the TCF labour market. Deeming all outworkers in the Victorian TCF industry to be employees (Option 3) would impose the same minimum rates of pay, and also potentially create other impacts beyond the rate of payment, going to conditions of ‘employment’ and regulation of the manner of performance of work: these additional impacts would have further effects on the TCF labour market. Legislation such as the Fair Employment Bill (Option 2) would have all the impacts of Option 3, and also, through changes to the regulation of employment generally, have impacts on Victorian labour markets generally.
2. This appendix addresses parameters which are relevant in assessing the economic impact of the minimum pay aspect of these options, which is common to all three. However, it is not possible to quantify the impact in any meaningful way, due to the absence of adequate statistical evidence on current conditions, as follows.
• There is no reliable data as to the total number of outworkers in either Australia or Victoria. It is notoriously difficult to obtain reliable data on the number or employment trends of homeworkers, a problem noted by the International Labour Organisation as common to many countries.[11]
− The Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia,[12] reports a figure of 329,000 total outworkers in Australia, and 144,000 outworkers in Victoria.
− The ATO provides a national figure for the number of individual homeworkers of 50,000 (no breakdown by State is given). As at May 1996, the ATO had identified (for taxation purposes only), 20,561 payees, or individual subcontractors and homeworkers.[13]
− The ABS[14] gives a total TCF employment figure of 88,105, and a total of 7,021 (or 7.9%) for those that work at home. [It should be noted that the ABS regards this figure as a significant underestimate due to the casual nature of the work causing fluctuations in employment, and the informal, underground aspects of homework which may cause homeworkers to be reluctant to identify themselves in Government surveys.]
• Compounding the problems associated with lack of data in relation to the number of outworkers is the additional problem of not being able to estimate how many of the total number of outworkers are contract outworkers as opposed to employee outworkers. An additional complexity relates to the difficulty in assessing to what extent contract outworkers are covered by the Clothing Trade Award (ie whether or not the manufacturers or middlemen for whom contract outworkers perform work are respondents to the Award).
• There is no reliable data relating to the wages paid to employee outworkers or the remuneration received by contract outworkers. Given the significant possibility of non-compliance with existing award provisions, it is difficult to isolate the effects of the proposals encompassed in either legislation such as the Victorian Fair Employment Bill or the legislation proposed by the Federal Government (the Workplace Relations Amendment (Improved Protection for Victorian Workers) Bill 2002). It would be unrealistic to assume 100 per cent compliance with existing legislation or award provisions for employee outworkers, however, there is no reliable data on which to make an assumption as to the current level of compliance.
− Anecdotal evidence[15] indicates that some outworkers may be paid at a rate as low as $2.00 per hour (no indication is given as to what proportion of outworkers might be receiving this rate of pay).
− The Industry Commission commented: “This is consistent with the view of the TCFUA and relevant community and welfare groups which believe that the majority of TCF homeworkers do not receive full award entitlements. In addition they have reported long delays in payment for work completed as well as under-payment and non-payment of agreed amounts. While piece rate payments equivalent to as low as $2 an hour have been reported ... it is thought that typical piece rates are currently equivalent to around $7 per hour for proficient workers, which is still well below the minimum award rate of $10.60 per hour.”[16]
• There is no reliable data which enables any accurate estimate of the number of hours worked by either contract outworkers or employee outworkers.
− Working from data supplied to its inquiry into TCF industries by TCF companies which use homeworkers, the Industry Commission estimated that the extent of homeworking in the clothing industry was equivalent to around 23,000 full time participants, and concluded: “... given the majority of homeworkers are thought to be working intermittently rather than full time, it is not possible to calculate the total number of people performing TCF homework from these figures.” [17]
− Another study, based on interviews with a sample of 100 outworkers in both NSW and Victoria, indicated that 92% of factory based workers considered themselves to be full-time, while 78% of outworkers considered themselves to be full-time. In the same survey, 6% of outworkers said they were part-time, 1% said they were casual, 5% answered 'other' and 10% had 'no response'. [It should also be noted that the same study indicated that the majority of those interviewed in fact worked for more than one 'employer'.[18]]
Adverse impacts on contract outworkers
3. It can be safely assumed
that any increase in minimum rates of remuneration would be expected to lead to
some loss of employment opportunities for contract outworkers otherwise engaged
in the Victorian TCF industry, particularly in those parts of the TCF labour
market where remuneration is currently lowest. The employment or engagement of
outworkers may well be particularly sensitive to real wage levels. While there
has only been a limited number of studies in Australia that have analysed the
relationship between wages and employment for unskilled workers, the
international evidence[19] suggests
that the employment of unskilled workers is more sensitive to wage rises than
the employment of skilled workers. The typical estimate of the elasticity of
labour demand at the aggregate level in Australia is around –0.8 (ie. a 1
per cent rise in real wages will lead to a 0.8 per cent decline in employment):
the elasticity of labour demand for outworkers may well be somewhat greater than
this, possibly in the order of
–1.3.
4. This observation that
increased remuneration could be expected to lead to loss of economic
opportunities is consistent with the Industry Commission conclusion that, whilst
it was not able to make a firm judgement regarding the proportion of homeworking
which would be likely to remain under a system in which homeworkers were part of
the formal economy, there would be a significant decline in the number of
homeworkers if award conditions were
observed.[20]
5. However,
this needs to be balanced against the observation of the TCFUA and others that
TCF outwork is largely concentrated in the fashion apparel sector, which is not
immediately suited to overseas production due to the short production runs and
quick demand responses required by customers. The TCFUA view is that the
fashion apparel sector may be better able than some other sectors to sustain any
retail price rises consequent on rises in the cost of labour, due to greater
product differentiation and closely targeted markets. “The local
advantages for some forms of clothing manufacturing ... imply that a proportion
of the clothing currently produced by homeworkers would continue to be
manufactured by them even if they were to be paid award
rates.”[21]
6. In
addition, employment effects will be dependent on the level of compliance with
the new system.
Beneficial impacts on contract outworkers
7. Raising the minimum
rates of remuneration for contract outworkers to match the minimum rates for
employee outworkers would have financial and social benefits for individual
outworkers. (For the reasons noted above, it is not possible to estimate
meaningfully how much rates of remuneration would be increased.) Social and
occupational health and safety effects could also be anticipated, as a result of
increasing outworkers’ pay. It may be possible for some outworkers to
decrease their hours of work, reduce the incidence of repetitive strain, and
improve their family arrangements, while retaining the flexibility inherent in
outwork.
8. Options 2, 3 and 4 would all provide contract outworkers with easier access to a remedy than is presently available, where they have been paid less than employee outworkers. Currently, a contract outworker would need to bring a Federal Court action under section 127A of the Workplace Relations Act, demonstrating that the contract is unfair or harsh, with a view to securing an order for any difference in pay compared to that received by an employee outworker. Under the proposed option, contract outworkers would only need to show that they were not receiving the correct amount of pay as specified under the Act, which would be a much easier case to argue than the unfairness of the contract. Also, contract outworkers would be able to bring such a claim in any court of competent jurisdiction (such as a Magistrate’s Court), which could be less expensive than the Federal Court.
NOTES ON CLAUSES
Clause 1 – Short
title
This is a formal provision specifying the short title of the
Act.
Clause 2 – Commencement
This clause specifies
when various provisions of the Act are proposed to commence. Section 1 to 3 and
anything in the Act not elsewhere covered by the table will commence on the day
on which the Act receives the Royal Assent. The amendments set out in Schedules
1 and 2 will commence on a single day to be fixed by proclamation, subject to
subsection (3).
Subclause 2(3) has the effect that if a provision of this
Act does not commence within six months of the day on which the Act receives the
Royal Assent, it will commence on the day following the end of that six month
period.
Clause 3 – Schedule(s)
Clause 3 provides
that each Act specified in a Schedule to this Act is amended or repealed as set
out in the Schedule, and that any other item in a Schedule operates according to
its terms.
Item 1 – After subsection 45(3)
1.1 Item 1 proposes to
insert new subsection 45(3A), which would entitle the Victorian Government to
intervene in certain appeals before the Full Bench of the Australian Industrial
Relations Commission (‘the Commission’). (Items 7, 10 and 13 would
give the Victorian Government rights of intervention in such matters at first
instance.)
1.2 The Victorian Government would have a right to intervene
in appeals in two circumstances. The first of these is an appeal against a
decision regarding the suspension or termination of a bargaining period under
section 170MW of the Act, where one or more employees in Victoria were to be
covered by the proposed agreement. The second is in relation to appeals under
section 501 of the Act setting or varying a minimum wage applicable to Victorian
employees.
1.3 Where a Minister of the Victorian Government applies to
intervene in these proceedings on behalf of the Government of Victoria, the
Commission must grant leave to intervene.
Item 2 – Subsection 86(1)
1.4 Item 2 proposes a revision
of subsection 86(1) of the Act, and the insertion of new subsection 86(1A).
Section 86 sets out the powers of authorised inspectors to enter into and
inspect workplaces for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the
requirements of the Act, and of certain industrial instruments made pursuant to
it. New subsection 86(1) would set out the general purposes for which
inspectors may exercise their powers.
1.5 Item 2 also proposes the
insertion of new paragraph 86(1A)(c), which would permit an inspector to require
a person to produce a document relevant to the purpose of ascertaining
compliance with the Act or an award or agreement (other than an Australian
Workplace Agreement) made under it, without first having to enter and inspect
the premises of the employer. At present, an inspector may only compel a person
to provide information in the course of an inspection of premises. That power
to obtain documents would remain – proposed subparagraph
86(1A)(b)(iv).
Item 3 – Subsection 86(2)
Item 4
– Subsection 86(3)
1.6 The amendments proposed by items 3 and 4
are consequential upon the restructure of section 86.
Item 5 –
After subsection 86(4)
1.7 Item 5 proposes to insert new subsections
86(4A), (4B) and (4C), which would apply where an inspector requests information
from a person pursuant to a notice issued under paragraph 86(1A)(c). New
subsection 86(4A) proposes the formal requirements for the notice. Proposed
subsection 86(4B) would statutorily abrogate the privilege against
self-incrimination; however, subsection 86(4C) would provide that any
information obtained as a result of a document produced under paragraph
86(1A)(c) would not be admissible in any criminal proceedings against that
individual, unless it is a prosecution for hindering or obstructing an inspector
in the exercise of his or her powers. These provisions are consistent with
Commonwealth criminal law policy.
1.8 Item 6 proposes to insert new subsections 86(6) and (7), which would
permit inspectors from the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations to
enter into and inspect workplaces in Victoria where the terms and conditions of
employment of the employees concerned are determined by a contract of employment
other than a Victorian employment agreement.
1.9 The inclusion of these
subsections would ensure that complaints of breaches of such contracts of
employment, and in particular, of the minimum conditions of employment contained
in Schedule 1A to the Act, would be able to be efficiently and effectively
investigated and resolved. In addition, the amendments would ensure consistency
with the regime which existed under the former Employee Relations Act
1992 (Vic), sections 148 and 149 of which conferred power on authorised
inspectors to enter premises and inspect documents for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with that Act.
Item 7 – After subsection
170MW(1)
1.10 Item 7 proposes to insert new subsection 170MW(1A) into
the Act. This would entitle the Victorian Government to intervene in an
application for the suspension or termination of a bargaining period for a
certified agreement under section 170MW if one or more of the employees who
would be subject to the proposed certified agreement is an employee in
Victoria.
1.11 Where a Minister of the Victorian Government applies to
intervene in these proceedings on behalf of the Government of Victoria, the
Commission must grant leave to intervene.
Item 8 – Section
305
1.12 The amendment to section 305 proposed by item 8 is
consequential upon the amendments made by item 2.
1.13 This item proposes to insert a legislative note at the end of
subsection 501(1), to alert readers to the fact that new section 501A also
contains provisions relevant to the minimum wage.
Item 10 – After subsection 501(2)
1.14 Item 10 proposes
to insert a new subsection (2A) into section 501 which would entitle the
Victorian Government to intervene in proceedings under section 501(1) relating
to the setting or adjusting of a minimum rate of pay for employment within a
declared industry sector.
1.15 To exercise this right, a Minister of the
Victorian Government must apply for leave to intervene, which the Commission
must grant.
New section 501A – Supported Wage System – minimum
wage
1.16 Item 11 proposes to insert a new section 501A into the Act.
This provision would enable the Commission to order that the Supported Wage
System (SWS) applies to Schedule 1A employment in a particular work
classification in a declared industry sector (as defined in section 489 of the
Act).
1.17 The SWS is a Commonwealth program to assist people with
disabilities to obtain employment in the open labour market. It includes
arrangements for calculating a pro-rata wage based on an assessment of an
employee’s productive capacity. The workplace relations arrangements that
set out the principles and procedures for establishing a pro rata wage and other
employment conditions are contained in a model clause which has been endorsed by
a Full Bench of the Commission.
1.18 At present (unlike employees under
federal awards and agreements that contain the SWS model clause) Schedule 1A
employees do not have direct access to the SWS, but must instead make individual
applications to the Commission under section 509 to obtain a certificate of
exemption from the relevant minimum wage set under section 501.
1.19 The
effect of a section 501A order would be to enable the SWS calculation of the
minimum wage to apply to those employees employed under the SWS, instead of the
minimum wage that would otherwise apply under paragraph 1(1)(c) of Schedule 1A
of the Act.
1.20 Before the Commission can make such an order there
must be an application by an eligible employee (or employees) within the
relevant work classification, an employer of such employees, the Commonwealth
Minister, or an organisation entitled to represent either the employers or the
employees.
Item 12 – Subsection 502(1)
1.21 Item 12
would amend subsection 502(1) to enable a section 501A proceeding to be referred
to the Full Bench of the Commission where the President is of the opinion that
the public interest warrants such a referral. (This reflects equivalent
arrangements for section 501 proceedings in relation to minimum wages
generally.)
Item 13 – After subsection
502(5)
1.22 Item 13 proposes to insert a new subsection (5A) into
section 502 of the Act.
1.23 Proposed subsection (5A) would enable the
Victorian Government to intervene in any section 501 proceeding that is referred
under section 502 of the Act to the Full Bench of the Commission.
1.24 The Commission must grant leave upon such an application being made
by a Minister of the Victorian Government.
Item 14 – Section
503
1.25 Item 14 proposes an amendment to section 503 to enable the
modified application of section 143 of the Act in relation to Commission orders
under new section 501A.
Item 15 – Subsection
506(2)
1.26 Item 15 proposes the repeal of existing subsection 506(2)
of the Act, and the insertion of new subsections 506(2) and 506(3). New
subsection 506(2) would permit proceedings to be brought for a penalty (under
section 178 of the Act) or a recovery of underpayments (under section 179) in
the case where a contract of employment, other than a Victorian employment
agreement, does not comply with a minimum term or condition set out in Schedule
1A to the Act.
1.27 Although section 533 allows an employee to seek a
penalty in respect of a breach of a minimum term or condition in Schedule 1A,
the section does not provide for the recovery of an amount of underpayment. In
addition, an inspector is unable to bring an action under section 533 on behalf
of an employee. Accordingly, the amendment proposed by this item would
facilitate enforcement of Schedule 1A entitlements by permitting inspectors to
bring actions under sections 178 and 179 on behalf of employees to whom those
entitlements apply. Item 20 would amend section 533 to ensure that an action
for a penalty for a breach of a Schedule 1A entitlement could not be instituted
under both that section and section 178.
1.28 New subsection 506(3)
would make clear that the amendment to subsection 506(2) is not intended to
prevent a person from taking action at common law in respect of such breaches.
Item 16 – At the end of Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part
XV
New section 509A – Stand down provisions in a contract of
employment (other than an employment agreement)
1.29 Item 16 proposes
the insertion of new section 509A, which would provide an employer with a
statutory entitlement to stand down a Schedule 1A employee in certain
circumstances.
1.30 Where a contract of employment of a Schedule 1A
employee does not provide for the standing-down of that employee when that
employee cannot be usefully employed because of any strike, breakdown of
machinery or stoppage of work for any cause for which the employer cannot
reasonably be held responsible, the contract of employment would be deemed to
contain the model stand-down provision set out in subsection 509A(2). The model
stand-down provision is in the same terms as the provision deemed to be included
in Victorian employment agreements by virtue of section 519 of the
Act.
1.31 This amendment is intended to address uncertainty amongst
employers and employees in Victoria as to the right of employers to stand down
employees to whom it was not possible to provide work.
Item 17
– Heading to Subdivision D of Division 3 of Part XV
1.32 Item
17 proposes the repeal of the existing heading to the Subdivision and its
replacement with a new heading, to reflect the changes proposed to Subdivision D
by item 18.
Item 18 – Section 514
1.33 Item 18
proposes the repeal of existing section 514, which currently provides that the
Workplace Relations Regulations 1996 (the Regulations) may require
employers of employees in Victoria to issue pay slips to those employees, and
its replacement with a new provision.
New section 514 - Making and
retaining employment records
1.34 Proposed section 514 would provide for a power to make regulations:
• requiring employers to keep and maintain employment records for employees employed under Victorian employment agreements, or pursuant to a contract of employment underpinned by the Schedule 1A minimum conditions;
• in relation to the inspection of such records;
and
• requiring employers to issue pay slips to those employees, as
prescribed by the Regulations.
Item 19 – Section
532
1.35 Item 19 proposes the repeal of section 532. Section 532
provides that regulations under section 353A in relation to employment records
and pay slips may be made in respect of employees employed under Victorian
employment agreements. As the power to make regulations would be contained in
new section 514, section 532 would no longer be necessary.
Item 20 – At the end of section 533
1.36 Item 20
proposes the insertion of new subsection 533(4). Section 533 provides for the
recovery of penalties in respect of a contravention of a ‘penalty’
provision. This allows a person to seek a penalty for contravention of
subsection 500(1), which provides that the minimum conditions of employment of
employees in Victoria are contained in Schedule 1A.
1.37 New subsection
533(4) would prevent a person from applying for a penalty under section 533 for
breach of a minimum term or condition of employment applicable to the employment
under section 500(1) if the person has already sought a penalty under section
178 in respect of that breach. (See also item 15.)
1.38 Item 21 proposes to replace current paragraphs 1(1)(a) and (b) with
new paragraphs. In particular, paragraph (b) is to be redrafted so as to
substitute the references to ‘sick leave’ with references to
‘personal leave’. The amendments would also make clear that casual
employees are not entitled to paid annual leave and paid personal
leave.
1.39 Paid personal leave is a consolidation of paid sick leave
(with respect to personal illness and injury) and carer’s leave (with
respect to a member of the employee’s immediate family or household who
requires the employee’s care and support – see also item 26).
1.40 Item 21 also proposes the inclusion of a new paragraph (ba) to
provide an additional entitlement to bereavement leave.
Item 22
– Paragraph 1(1)(c) of Schedule 1A
1.41 Item 22 proposes to
amend paragraph (1)(1)(c) to include a reference to paragraph (1)(1)(ca), which
is to be inserted by item 23.
1.42 Item 23 proposes to amend paragraph (1)(1)(ca), which provides that
where an employee’s wage is set in accordance with the SWS, the wage rate
calculated under the SWS is the employee’s minimum wage.
1.43 Item 24 proposes to insert new paragraph 1(1)(f). This amendment
would clarify that an employee whose terms and conditions of employment are
governed by a contract of employment underpinned by the Schedule 1A minima is
entitled to payment for work performed in excess of 38 hours a week.
1.44 Item 25 would amend Schedule 1A to provide that hours worked in a
week that are in excess of 38 are to be paid at the same hourly rate of pay as
that applicable to the employee for his or her work classification as determined
by the Commission under section 501 or 501A, unless the employer and employee
agree to a higher hourly rate.
Item 26 – At the end of Part 1
of Schedule 1A
1.45 Item 26 proposes a series of amendments
concerning the calculation of the entitlements to annual leave, personal leave
and bereavement leave, and the requirements for taking such leave.
1.46 The amendments remedy an uncertainty generated by the current
calculus which is based on the number of ordinary hours worked in a particular
period (depending on the type of leave). This formula has led to uncertainty
where the ordinary hours that the employee is required to work vary from week to
week.
1.47 Currently, part (a) of paragraph 1(1) of Schedule 1A makes provision
for the calculation of minimum entitlements to paid annual leave on the basis of
the number of ordinary hours worked in any four week period in a year.
The new paragraph simplifies the pro-rata calculus of annual leave entitlements.
1.48 Item 26 also proposes to clarify matters associated with the annual
leave entitlement, including that it counts as service for all purposes, is to
be paid at the time the employee takes annual leave or leaves his or her
employment, and that annual leave must be taken within 12 months after the end
of the year in which it accrued unless agreed otherwise. In addition, the rules
about annual leave empower the employer to direct the employee to take annual
leave when the business is shut down for a period (eg a Christmas close down, or
seasonal shut down).
1.49 Currently, paragraph (b) of subclause 1(1) of Schedule 1A makes
provision for the calculation of minimum entitlements to paid sick leave. The
new paragraph would provide for a broader entitlement to paid personal leave
(which as noted is a consolidation of sick and carer’s leave). The
amendments to Schedule 1A proposed by item 26 would detail when personal leave
may be used, and how the entitlement is to be
calculated.
1.50 Personal leave must be paid when an employee takes
personal leave. An employee accrues personal leave depending upon the length of
service with the employer as follows:
• an employee who has worked
for the employer for less than 12 months accrues one day of personal leave for
each completed 6 weeks;
• an employee who has worked for the
employer for 12 months or more is entitled to 8 days personal leave each
year;
• part-time employees accrue personal leave on a pro-rata
basis.
1.51 At the end of each year of employment, unused personal leave
will accumulate at a maximum rate of eight days per year
1.52 The use of
paid personal leave is subject to the conditions attaching to, respectively,
sick leave and carer’s leave (below).
1.53 This provision details the conditions surrounding the entitlement to
paid sick leave.
1.54 After five months with the one employer, an
employee is entitled to be reimbursed for up to four days unpaid sick leave
which he or she may have taken during that five-month period in circumstances
where the entitlement to paid sick leave had not accrued due to insufficient
service. This would apply, for example, if the employee had taken four days off
work due to the flu during the first month of service, when no sick leave at all
had yet accrued.
1.55 An employee is not entitled to paid sick leave if
he or she is receiving concurrent payments under any workers’ compensation
scheme.
1.56 The entitlement to paid sick leave is conditional on the
employee’s prompt notification to the employer. The employer is entitled
to request a medical certificate from the employee.
1.57 An employee is entitled to up to five days’ paid leave each
year to care for and support sick members of his or her immediate family or
household.
1.58 An employee cannot take paid carer’s leave if
another person has also taken leave to support the same family or household
member at the same time.
1.59 The entitlement to paid carer’s
leave is conditional on the employee’s prompt notification to the
employer. The employer is entitled to ask the employee, by way of a medical
certificate or statutory declaration, to establish the nature of the illness of
the person cared for, and the need of that person for care and support by
another person.
1.60 Item 26 also proposes a new entitlement to bereavement leave in the
event of the death of an immediate family or household member. The entitlement
is a maximum 2 days paid leave for each death. For example, if there is an
event resulting in multiple fatalities in the employee’s immediate family
or household the employee is entitled to 2 days’ paid bereavement leave
for each death.
1.61 This entitlement is non-cumulative.
1.62 Item 26 also proposes definitions of ‘immediate family’
and ‘de facto spouse’ for the purposes of the entitlements to
carer’s leave and bereavement leave.
Part 2 – Application and saving provisions
Item 27 – Definition
1.63 Item 27 would provide that
references to ‘Principal Act’ in this Part are to the Workplace
Relations Act 1996.
Item 28 – Application of item
1
1.64 Item 28 would provide that the Victorian Government may
intervene in appeals to the Full Bench against decisions under section 170MW and
section 501:
• where the appeal was instituted, but not determined,
before the commencement of item 1; and
• appeals to the Full Bench
instituted on or after the commencement of that item.
Item 29 –
Application of item 7
1.65 Item 29 would provide that the Victorian
Government may intervene in applications under section 170MW to suspend or
terminate a bargaining period in the following
circumstances:
• where the section 170MW application was
instituted, but not determined, before the commencement of item 7;
and
• section 170MW applications made on or after the commencement
of that item.
Item 30 – Application of item
10
1.66 Item 30 would provide that the Victorian Government may
intervene in applications for minimum wage orders under section 501 of the Act
in the following circumstances:
• where the section 501 application
was instituted, but not determined, before the commencement of item 10;
and
• section 501 applications made on or after the commencement of
that item.
Item 31 – Application of item 13
1.67 This
item would provide that the Victorian Government may intervene in proceedings
referred to a Full Bench of the Commission under section 502 of the Act in the
following circumstances:
• where a section 501 proceeding was
referred to a Full Bench under section 502, but it had not been determined,
before the commencement of item 13; and
• proceedings referred to a
Full Bench under section 502 after the commencement of item 13.
Item
32 – Application of item 15
1.68 Item 32 proposes that a person
would only be able to institute proceedings under sections 178 and 179 of the
Act in respect of a breach of a minimum condition of employment set out in
Schedule 1A that occurs on or after the commencement of item 15 of this
Schedule.
Item 33 – Saving provision in relation to certain
regulations made for the purposes of sections 353A and 514 of the Principal
Act
1.69 Item 33 would provide for the preservation of regulations
made under sections 353A that prescribe record-keeping requirements in respect
of employees covered by a Victorian employment agreement. On commencement of
items 17, 18 and 19 of this Schedule, the regulations would be taken to have
been made under proposed subsection 514(2).
1.70 In addition, item 33
would provide for the preservation of regulations made in relation to pay slips
under section 514 of the WR Act. On commencement of item 18, the regulations
would be taken to have been made under proposed subsection
514(3).
Item 34 – Application of items 21 and 26 – annual
leave
1.71 Item 34 would provide that the amendments to Schedule 1A
relating to the annual leave entitlement would apply in respect of the first
year of the employee’s employment that commences on or after the
commencement of items 21 and 26 of this Schedule and each subsequent year
of employment.
1.72 This item would also deal with the case where an
employee was employed before the date of commencement of the items, and
continues in employment after commencement. The amendments would apply in
respect of such an employee in respect of the year beginning on the (next)
anniversary of the employee’s engagement, and each subsequent year of the
employee’s employment.
Item 35 – Application of items 21
and 26 – personal leave
1.73 Item 35 would provide that the
amendments to Schedule 1A relating to the personal leave entitlement would apply
in respect of the first year of the employee’s employment that commences
on or after the commencement of items 21 and 26 of this Schedule and each
subsequent year of employment. In addition, the amendments relating to personal
leave apply in respect of personal leave taken on or after the day of their
commencement.
1.74 Item 35 would also provide that, from the date of
commencement of items 21 and 26, any sick leave accumulated by an employee under
paragraph (1)(1)(b) of Schedule 1A as in force immediately before the day of
commencement will be taken to be personal leave.
Item 36 –
Bereavement leave
1.75 Item 36 would provide that the entitlement to
bereavement leave applies in relation to deaths occurring on or after the
commencement of item 26.
SCHEDULE 2 – CONTRACT OUTWORKERS IN VICTORIA IN THE TEXTILE,
CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY
2.1 This Schedule proposes amendments
of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (the Act) so as to provide an
entitlement for persons performing work as outworkers for the textile, clothing
and footwear (TCF) industry in Victoria, under contracts for services, to be
paid at least the amounts they would have been required to be paid for the work
because of Part XV of the Act (that is, because of Schedule 1A, or section 509
where applicable) if they had performed it as employees.
2.2 The
amendments will also provide for enforcement of this entitlement, and enable the
making of regulations in relation to the keeping and inspection of records
concerning contract outwork, as required for the enforceability of the new
entitlement.
2.3 For constitutional reasons, the core obligation and
entitlement proposed by the Schedule will apply, on enactment, only to the
extent of contracts for services entered into by constitutional corporations, or
where work is contracted to performed under a contract for services in the
course of, or in relation to, interstate or international trade or commerce.
2.4 This Part contains the principal item (item 3), which proposes the
insertion of a new Part into the Act, and two other items proposing
consequential amendments. (Part 2 of this Schedule contains the transitional
provision.)
Item 1 – Subsection 86(1)
2.5 This item
proposes a consequential amendment to section 86, which provides for the powers
of inspectors appointed under the Act, for the purpose of ascertaining whether
awards, certified agreements and the Act generally are being complied with. New
section 542, proposed by item 3, will provide for powers of inspectors in
respect of compliance with new section 541 (which will impose the core
obligation certainly owed to persons working as outworkers under contracts for
services). Accordingly, this amendment establishes that inspectors’
powers under section 86 apply in respect of compliance with the Act, other than
section 541, so that the powers under sections 86 and 542 will not overlap.
Item 2 – Section 305
2.6 This item proposes a
consequential amendment to section 305, which establishes the offence of
obstructing an inspector. One limb of the prohibition presently refers to
requirements made by an inspector under section 86; a corresponding reference to
requirements made by an inspector under new section 542 is required, and this
item provides such a reference.
Item 3 – After Part
XV
2.7 This is the principal item of this Schedule, which proposes
the insertion of the operative provisions, particularly the core obligation
towards persons working as outworkers under contracts for services in the TCF
industry.
New Part XVI – Contract outworkers in Victoria in
the
textile, clothing and footwear industry
2.8 This new Part would come at the end of the Act, after Part XV,
‘Matters referred by Victoria’.
New section 537 – Object of Part
2.9 This section
will set out the object of the new Part.
New section 538 –
Definitions
2.10 This section will define terms to be used by
provisions in the new Part.
2.11 ‘Contract outworker’ is
defined as an individual (which means a natural person, by the Acts
Interpretation Act 1901) who is a party to a contract for services performs
work under the contract for another party or parties to the contract. (The
scope of the core obligation is defined by reference to the contract under which
a contract outworker works, although it is not only owed to persons who are
parties to the contract; this is explained in relation to new section 541,
below.)
2.12 ‘Court of competent jurisdiction’ is defined
for the purposes of enforcement under this Part, in the same way as the term is
defined in section 177A for the purposes of enforcement under Part VI.
2.13 ‘Employee’ is defined to have the same meaning as in
Part XV, ‘Matters referred by Victoria’, so that there is no gap
between the safety net provided for employee outworkers in the TCF industry in
Victoria and the safety net to be provided for contract outworkers by the new
Part.
New Division 2 – New Commonwealth
provisions
New Subdivision A – General
2.14 This Subdivision sets out the extent to which the core obligation
will apply. This is not universal, because of limits on the
Commonwealth’s legislative power under the Constitution.
New
section 539 – Constitutional corporations
2.15 This section
will provide that the Part applies where a party to a relevant contract for
services is a constitutional corporation. ‘Constitutional
corporation’ is defined broadly in section 4 of the Act.
New
section 540 – Interstate trade or commerce etc.
2.16 This
section will provide that the Part also applies where work is contracted to be
performed under a contract for services in the course of, or in relation to,
international, interstate or intraterritorial trade or commerce.
New Subdivision B – Minimum rate of
pay
New section 541 – Minimum rate of pay
2.17 This section
will impose the core obligation which the rest of the Part supports. Subsection
(1) sets up the framework of the core obligation; the elements of the
subsection, which are explained below, are as follows. It refers to work which
is ‘performed under and in accordance with a contract for services’,
and is ‘performed by the contract outworker or one or more other
individuals who are not parties to the contract’, and ‘satisfies the
criteria in subsection (2)’, then obliges ‘a person who is obliged
under the contract to pay for the work performed’ to pay the persons
‘not less than the statutory amount’ for their work. These elements
are explained below.
2.18 As noted above, the core obligation is not only
owed to the outworker who entered into the contract, but also to other persons
working as outworkers under the contract. There are a number of limitations on
this breadth.
• Where a contract outworker
subcontracts all or part of the work, which is then performed by other
outworkers, the core obligation will be owed to those other outworkers by the
first contract outworker (who will be the principal for the purposes of the
subcontract), as the work will be regarded as having been performed under the
subcontract, rather than under the primary contract; this is made clear by
subsection (7).
• Where a contract
outworker employs other persons to assist in the performance of a contract for
services, those persons will have at least the minimum entitlements of employees
under Schedule 1A of the Act.
• It will
remain open to a principal to stipulate in a contract that the personal services
of a particular person, such as the contract outworker, are required, and in
this case any work undertaken by any other person would not be work performed
‘in accordance with’ the contract.
2.19 This leaves
the case where work is undertaken by a group of outworkers, not under any
contractual arrangement as between themselves (typically members of a family
working together), under and for the purposes of a contract which did not
specify how the services contracted for were to be performed. In such a case,
the safety net established by the core obligation extends to all of the persons
performing work, leaving no scope for evasion on the basis of uncertainty as to
contractual arrangements.
2.20 The criteria in subsection (2), which work
has to satisfy if it is to be covered by the core obligation, are that the work
is performed in Victoria, the work is for the textile, clothing and footwear
industry (this is broadly defined), and the work is performed in private
residential premises or premises that are not business or commercial premises of
a principal to the contract.
2.21 The core obligation is imposed upon
‘a person who is obliged under the contract to pay for the work
performed’ to cover cases where there may be more than two parties to the
contract.
2.22 The ‘statutory amount’ is identified by
subsection (3), with subsection (4), for the general case, and by subsection
(5), for the special case of a person holding a certificate under section 509 of
the Act.
2.23 Subsection (3) provides that the statutory amount (the
minimum amount which must be paid) is the amount which the person would have
been entitled to be paid, because of clause 1 of Schedule 1A to the Act, for the
work in question, if he or she had performed it as an employee in Victoria. The
statutory amount will be worked out in the way the amount would have been worked
out under Schedule 1A. For example, if a contract outworker’s contract
provided for payment on a piece-rate basis, and the work to be performed was
work for which an employee could be engaged on a piece-rate basis under the
applicable minimum wage order in force under section 501 of the Act (as is
presently provided under the Manufacturing Industry Sector Minimum Wage Order
– Victoria 1997), then the principal would have to make payments in
accordance with a piece-rate not less than the minimum piece-rate specified
under the order.
2.24 Subsection (4) provides that, for the purposes of
subsection (3), provisions of clause 1 that deal with paid leave are to be
disregarded. This makes clear that the minimum payment does not include any
payments that would have had to be made for periods in which the outworker was
unable to work and would, if an employee, have been eligible for paid leave; it
only includes payments in respect of the work actually
performed.
2.25 Subsection (5) applies where a person holds a certificate
under section 509. The Australian Industrial Relations Commission can give an
employee a certificate, which has the effect that the relevant minimum rate of
pay otherwise applicable under Schedule 1A does not apply to the employee, if
the Commission is satisfied that, because of the person’s age, infirmity
or slowness, the person is unable to obtain work at the relevant minimum rate
otherwise applicable. In such a case, the minimum rate of pay specified in the
certificate applies instead. Where a person working as an outworker holds such
a certificate, the statutory amount for the purposes of new section 541 is to be
worked out by reference to the minimum rate of pay specified in the
person’s certificate.
New Subdivision C – Inspectors
New section 542 – Powers of inspectors
2.26 This new
section will provide the powers necessary for investigation of compliance with
the core obligation in new section 541. It is supplemented by the enforcement
powers to be provided in the following Subdivision. New section 542 closely
parallels section 86 of the Act (as it is proposed to be amended by items 2 to 6
of Schedule 1 to the Bill), with the appropriate changes to reflect the nature
of the core obligation. It will authorise inspectors (appointed under section
84 of the Act), for the purpose of ascertaining whether the core obligation is
being (or has been) observed:
• to enter
premises where relevant work is performed or a place of business where there are
relevant documents;
• to inspect, take
samples, interview persons, require production of documents and inspect, make
copies of or take extracts from documents;
and
• to require production of a document
(subject to a limited use immunity).
New Subdivision D – Enforcement of minimum rate of pay
New section 543 – Imposition and recovery of
penalties
2.27 This new section will provide for imposition of civil
penalties for breaches of new section 541, on application by an inspector or a
person to whom the core obligation was relevantly owed. It closely parallels
section 178 of the Act, with the appropriate changes. On an application for a
penalty, a court may also order payment of the amount of any
underpayment.
New section 544 – Recovery of
pay
2.28 This new section will provide for actions for recovery of
payments owed under new section 541. It closely parallels section 179 of the
Act, with the appropriate changes.
New section 545 – Interest up
to judgment
New section 546 – Interest on
judgment
2.29 These new sections will provide for interest on amounts
owed under new section 541, up to and after any judgment under new sections 543
or 544. They closely parallel sections 179A and 179B of the Act, with the
appropriate changes.
New section 547 – Plaintiffs may choose
small claims procedure in magistrates’ courts
2.30 This new
section will enable a person pursuing an action for recovery of a payment owed
under new section 541, in a magistrate’s court, to elect for a small
claims procedure to apply. It closely parallels sections 179C and 179D of the
Act, with the appropriate changes.
New section 548 –
Enforcement of penalties etc.
2.31 This new section will provide for
enforcement of penalties ordered in proceedings under new section 543. It
closely parallels section 357 of the Act, with the appropriate
changes.
New section 549 – Records relating to contracts for
services with contract outworkers
2.32 This new section, which will
parallel section 353A of the WR Act, will enable the regulations to make
provision in relation to:
§ the making of outworker records (records
relating to contracts for services, to the extent that work to be performed
under the contracts meets the criteria in new subsection 541(2)), by persons
subject to the obligation under new subsection 541(1) and by persons to whom the
obligation is owed;
§ the inspection of outworker
records;
§ the giving of outworker records by a party
to the contract to another party; and
§ the retention of outworker
records.
2.33 It is envisaged that the regulations will require records
to be made, exchanged and retained by principals and by contract outworkers.
The records, which would partly fulfil the function of employer time and wage
records, and partly fulfil the function of employee payslips, are likely to be
required to include information on matters such as the work performed, the hours
worked, the payments made in respect of the work performed and the basis on
which the payments were calculated. It is anticipated that the regulations will
be informed by current regulations 131A to 131U of the Workplace Relations
Regulations. The regulations would be subject to prior consultation, and
possible disallowance, in the normal manner.
Part 2 – Application
2.34 This Part proposes the transitional provision to apply in relation to
the amendments proposed by Part 1 of this Schedule.
Item 4 –
Application of amendments made by Part 1
2.35 This item proposes that
the new provisions proposed by Part 1 are to apply to all work performed after
their commencement (which will occur on a date to be proclaimed), regardless of
whether the contract under which the work is performed was entered into before
or after that commencement. This is to provide the earliest possible
application of the safety net proposed by Part 1, for the benefit of contract
outworkers.
[1] An outworker is a person who
performs work for another person, other than in any premises of the second
person – typically, though not necessarily, in domestic
premises.
[2] Senate Economics
References Committee, Outworkers in the Garment Industry, December
1996. Figures quoted in Chapter 2 – ‘Outworkers and Garment
Production’, with estimates varying between those of the Australian
Taxation Office (50,000) and those of the Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union
of Australia (329,000).
[3] An
employee outworker is one engaged under a contract of service. A
contract outworker is one engaged under a contract for
services.
[4] The Senate
Economics References Committee (op. cit.) concluded that outworking “is
now so prevalent that it is not just a characteristic of the [clothing]
industry, the entire industry is structured around
it”.
[5] Textile, Clothing
and Footwear Union of Australia, The Hidden Cost of Fashion, Report on the
National Outwork Information Campaign, March
1995.
[6] It is conceivable that
some employee outworkers could be covered by a certified agreement or Australian
Workplace Agreement under the WR Act; such regulation, above the safety net, may
be presumed to be at least as beneficial for the employee as the underpinning
award, so does not require further
consideration.
[7] Independent
contractors working under a contract not affected by the Clothing Trades Award
presently have some remedies against harsh or unfair contracts, or
unconscionable conduct, as set out under Option 1
below.
[8] A respondent is any
person or organisation bound by an award. Federal awards are generally limited
in their binding force to persons, organisations, and members of organisations
which the Commission has identified formally as being parties to the relevant
industrial dispute. (This is different from the situation of State awards,
which may be common rule awards, binding all employers and employees in a
particular industry.)
[9] Textile,
Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia, The Hidden Cost of Fashion,
March 1995.
[10] The
Homeworkers Code of Practice is a voluntary self-regulatory scheme that
provides for the accreditation of parties along the garment manufacturing and
retail chain. It is designed to supplement the outworker provisions of the
Clothing Trades Award and was negotiated by industry participants in
1997.
[11] International Labour
Organisation, Globalisation of the Footwear, Textiles and Clothing Industries
– Report for discussion at the Tripartite Meeting on the Globalisation of
the Footwear, Textiles and Clothing Industries: Effects on Unemployment and
Working Conditions, ILO, Geneva,
1996.
[12] Textile, Clothing and
Footwear Union of Australia The Hidden Cost of Fashion, Report on the
National Outwork Information Campaign, March
1995.
[13] Australian Taxation
Office, Estimates of Activity in the Clothing Industry, 1990-1991, noted
in the Industry Commission Report, Op. cit., p.
D.10.
[14] Australian Bureau of
Statistics, 1991 Census of Population and Housing, unpublished
data, noted in the Industry Commission Report,
Ibid.
[15] Reported by
the Senate Economic References Committee, Outworkers in the Garment
Industry, December 1996.
[16]
Industry Commission Report, Op. cit., p.
122-123
[17]
Ibid., p.
122.
[18] UNSW Studies in
Australian Industrial Relations, Mayhew, C. and Quinlan, M., Outsourcing and
Occupational Health & Safety: A Comparative Study of Factory-based and
Outworkers in the Australian TCF Industry, Industrial Relations Research
Centre, 1998.
[19] See for
example Hamermesh, D., Labor Demand, Princeton University Press,
1993.
[20] Industry Commission
Report (No. 59), The Textiles, Clothing and Footwear Industries, 9
September 1997, p. 123-124
[21]
Ibid.