Commonwealth Consolidated Regulations

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Regulation] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

PATENTS REGULATIONS 1991 - REG 3.2B

Specifications: formalities check for innovation patents

  (1)   For section   52 of the Act, a complete application for an innovation patent passes the formalities check only if the application meets all of the following requirements:

  (a)   the patent request complies with subsection   29(4A) of the Act;

  (b)   the complete specification for the application complies with subsection   29(4B) of the Act;

  (c)   if the applicant is an eligible person under section   34 of the Act -- a copy of the court order declaring that the applicant is an eligible person in relation to the invention must be filed with the complete application;

  (d)   the complete application must comply with regulation   3.8, 3.10, 3.11, 6A.1 or 6A.2, or subsection   79C(2) of the Act, if applicable;

  (e)   if the applicant is relying on section   41 of the Act -- the receipts mentioned in paragraph   3.1(2 )( c) must be filed with the complete application;

  (f)   the complete specification must not be a cross - reference to an earlier patent application filed in Australia or in a Convention country;

  (g)   the complete specification must not contravene subsection   18(2) or (3) of the Act;

  (h)   if the application is a divisional application made under section   79B of the Act in relation to an original application that is a PCT application, the complete specification for the PCT application must be open to public inspection ;

  (i)   if the application was converted from an application for a standard patent to an application for an innovation patent--the request to amend the patent request to convert the application was filed on a day that is before the day the term of the innovation patent, if granted, would have expired;

  (j)   if the application is a divisional application under section   79B of the Act--the divisional application was filed on a day that is before the day the term of the innovation patent, if granted, would have expired;

  (k)   the requirement specified in subsection   52(3) of the Act.

Note 1:   Subsection   52(3) of the Act provides that it is a requirement of the formalities check that the date of the patent (if granted) would be a date before the day that subsection commences. Subsection   52(3) was inserted by the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Productivity Commission Response Part   2 and Other Measures) Act 2020 .

Note 2:   For the date of the patent, see section   65 of the Act and regulation   6.3.

  (2)   If the application does not meet a requirement mentioned in paragraph   ( 1 )( a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) , (h) or (k) , the Commissioner must direct the applicant to do anything necessary to ensure that the application meets the requirement.

  (3)   If an applicant to whom a direction under subregulation   (2) has been given does not comply with the direction within 2 months from the date of the direction, the application lapses.

  (4)   If the application does not meet the requirement mentioned in paragraph   ( 1 )( g), the Commissioner must direct the applicant to ensure that the application meets the requirement.

  (5)   If an applicant to whom a direction under subregulation   (4) has been given does not respond to the direction within 2 months from the date of the direction, the application lapses.

  (6)   If an applicant to whom a direction under subregulation   (4) has been given does not comply with the direction within 4 months from the date of the direction, the application lapses.

  (7)   If an application lapses under subregulation   (3), (5) or (6), the Commissioner must:

  (a)   advertise that fact in the Official Journal ; and

  (b)   notify the applicant of the lapse.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback