[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2005 (NO. 1) (SLI NO 19 OF 2005)
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Select Legislative Instrument 2005 No.
19
LEGISLATIVE INSTRUMENT
Issued by the authority of
the Minister for Fisheries, Forestry and Conservation
Fisheries Management Act 1991
Fisheries Management Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1 )
The
Regulation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative
Instruments Act 2003.
Subsection
168(1) of the Fisheries Management Act
1991 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations, not
inconsistent with the Act, prescribing all matters required or permitted by the
Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed, in carrying
out or giving effect to the Act.
Following
a spate of catches of endangered albatrosses off the east coast of Australia at
the end of 2004, some north of the parallel of 30º South, the Australian
Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) has reviewed the provisions of the Fisheries
Management Regulations 1992 (the Principal Regulations) in relation to the incidental catch of
seabirds. These provisions are contained in Divisions 1 and 2 of Part 12 of the
Principal Regulations (comprising Regulations 68 – 74 inclusive). Schedule 3D is
also relevant, prescribing certain apparatus for the purposes of Divisions 1
and 2 of Part 12.
The
bycatch mitigation practice which most effectively addresses catches of
endangered albatrosses is currently prescribed and enforceable only in waters
south of latitude 30º South. The practice can only be recommended for use in
waters north of that latitude.
In
order for AFMA to manage the issue of seabird bycatch more flexibly and
responsively it is intended that the relevant measures prescribed by the
Principal Regulations be incorporated, as required, as conditions to fishing
permits granted under the Act. This will allow AFMA the flexibility to
implement immediate mitigation measures when necessary, not only in southern
waters, in order to counter the threat of longline fishing to seabirds. In so
doing, AFMA Management will have the capacity to manage
the issue of seabird bycatch with a far greater degree of responsiveness in
accordance with available data and scientific advice.
The
Regulations therefore omitted Divisions 1 and 2 of Part 12 and Schedule 3D to
the Principal Regulations. The Regulations remove any
ambiguity about the operation of the Principal Regulation and facilitate enforcement
of bycatch mitigation practices `through uniformity of approach. They are not a
prerequisite to the inclusion of measures as conditions in fishing permits.
The
amendments have been endorsed by the Eastern Tuna Management Advisory Committee
and a subset of the Threat Abatement Team, known informally as the Pelagic
Bycatch Group. These groups include a wide range of representatives from
Commonwealth and State Government Departments, non-government organisations,
commercial industry and the recreational sector.
The
Office of Regulation Review advised that a Regulation Impact Statement is not
mandatory on the basis that the proposal is of a minor or machinery nature and
does not substantially alter existing arrangements (ID 7078).
The
Act does not specify any conditions as needing to be met before the power to
make the proposed Regulations may be exercised.
Details of the Regulations, which are to commence
on
Regulation
1 provides for the Regulations to be cited as
the Fisheries Management Amendment
Regulations 2005 (No. 1)
Regulation
2 provides that the Regulations commence on
Regulation
3 provides that Schedule 1 amends the Principal
Regulations.
Schedule
1 Item 1 omits Part 12, Divisions 1 and 2 of the
Principal Regulations.
Schedule
1 Item 2 omits Schedule 3D of the Principal
Regulations