(1) This section applies if evidence is given, or is likely to be given, or a question is asked, or is likely to be asked, of a witness that tends to suggest that, after the sexual offence the subject of the criminal proceeding is alleged to have been committed, the complainant—(a) continued a relationship with the defendant; or(b) otherwise continued to communicate with the defendant.
(2) The judge must direct the jury that experience shows that—(a) people may react differently to non-consensual sexual activity and there is no typical, normal or proper response to non-consensual sexual activity; and(b) some people who are subjected to non-consensual sexual activity will never again contact the person who subjected them to the activity, while others—(i) may continue a relationship with that person; or(ii) may otherwise continue to communicate with that person; and(c) there may be good reasons why a person who is subjected to non-consensual sexual activity—(i) may continue a relationship with the person who subjected them to the activity; or(ii) may otherwise continue to communicate with that person.Examples of good reasons—1 The person was overborne by the abuse of a relationship of authority, trust or dependence.2 The person fears family dissolution.3 The person has a fear of ostracism from their community.