(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), on proof of their service on the accused in accordance with Part 4.4, the following are admissible as if their contents were a record of evidence given orally—
(a) any statement the truthfulness of which has been attested to, other than a statement that is inadmissible under section 134(2);
(b) any exhibit or document referred to in a statement which is admissible;
(c) any recording the truthfulness of the contents of which has been attested to, other than a recording that is inadmissible under section 134(2);
(d) any other recording a transcript of which has been served in the hand-up brief, other than a recording that is inadmissible under section 134(2).
(2) The Magistrates' Court may rule as inadmissible the whole or any part of—
(a) a statement; or
(b) any exhibit or document referred to in a statement; or
(c) the contents of a recording.
S. 139(3) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 14(b).
(3) A recording, a transcript of which has been served in the hand-up brief, is only admissible if it is proved that the accused and his or her legal practitioner were given a reasonable opportunity to listen to and, in the case of an audiovisual recording, view the recording.